The site was identified as important in 2000 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pied Avocet Recurvirostra avosetta | LC | breeding | 1994 | 300 breeding pairs | B1i, B3, C2 |
Eurasian Golden Plover Pluvialis apricaria | LC | passage | 1994 | 20,000 individuals | A4i, B1i, C2 |
A4iii Species group - waterbirds | n/a | passage | 1994 | 20,000-49,999 individuals | A4iii, C4 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2000) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2000. The most recent assessment (2019) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2019 | not assessed | very high | not assessed |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | unset | - |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Natural system modifications | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Other | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | No management plan exists but the management planning process has begun | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | not assessed |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1968 | Tange Bakker | Fredet ved afgørelse, exl. Kirkeomgivelser | 1 |
1983 | Ribe Holme og enge med Kongeåens udløb | Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) | 94 |
1987 | Vadehavet | Ramsar Site, Wetland of International Importance | 100 |
1992 | Esbjerg Kommune | §3 beskyttet natur (alle søer, moser, vandløb, heder, enge mv) | 3 |
1998 | Vadehavet med Ribe Å; Tved Å og Varde Å vest for Varde | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 11 |
2010 | Nationalpark Vadehavet | Nationalpark | - |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Grassland | Humid grasslands | 90 |
Unknown | 10 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
agriculture | 90 |
unknown | 10 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Ribe Holme and meadows at Kongeåen (Denmark). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/ribe-holme-and-meadows-at-kongeåen-iba-denmark on 23/11/2024.