The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2007 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List | Season (year/s of estimate) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|
Barnacle Goose Branta leucopsis | LC | breeding (2005–2006) | 2 pairs | C6 |
Greylag Goose Anser anser | LC | passage (2000–2006) | 2,000–3,000 birds | B1i, C3 |
Smew Mergellus albellus | LC | passage (2000–2006) | 50–100 birds | C2, C6 |
Western Marsh-harrier Circus aeruginosus | LC | breeding (2000–2006) | 4–5 pairs | C6 |
White-tailed Sea-eagle Haliaeetus albicilla | LC | winter (2000–2006) | 6–10 birds | C6 |
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2007. The most recent assessment (2018) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2018 | good | medium | high |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Wetlands (inland) | good (>90%) | good (>90%) | good |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Residential and commercial development | likely in short term (<4 years) | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Designation | Planning | Action | Result |
Whole area (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented, but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | high |
Year | Protected Area | Designation (management category) | % coverage of IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1968 | Venan | Wildlife and Plant Sanctuary (-) | 12 |
1968 | Oset | Nature Reserve (IV) | 9 |
1995 | Rynningeviken | Nature Reserve (IV) | 19 |
2015 | Oset och Rynningeviken | Nature Reserve (IV) | 28 |
The Local Conservation Group(s) listed below are working to conserve this IBA.
Name | Year formed |
---|---|
Närkes ornitologiska förening | 0 |
Habitat | % of IBA | Habitat detail |
---|---|---|
Wetlands (inland) | 70 | Standing freshwater; Water fringe vegetation |
Forest | 20 | Broadleaved deciduous woodland; Alluvial and very wet forest; Mixed woodland |
Grassland | 5 | Humid grasslands |
Shrubland | 5 | Scrub |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
nature conservation and research | 100 |
tourism/recreation | 60 |
agriculture | 20 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Bay of Rynninge (Sweden). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/bay-of-rynninge-iba-sweden on 26/12/2024.