Current view: Data table and detailed info
Taxonomic source(s)
del Hoyo, J., Collar, N.J., Christie, D.A., Elliott, A., Fishpool, L.D.C., Boesman, P. and Kirwan, G.M. 2016. HBW and BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World. Volume 2: Passerines. Lynx Edicions and BirdLife International, Barcelona, Spain and Cambridge, UK.
IUCN Red List criteria met and history
Red List criteria met
Red List history
Migratory status |
not a migrant |
Forest dependency |
high |
Land-mass type |
|
Average mass |
- |
Population justification: As a consequence of the substantial declines in the past, the population was suspected to number less than 10,000 mature individuals. Given the recent recovery and the frequency of records within the range (per eBird 2023), the population is now likely considerably larger than this, though the historic population was certainly far larger. An accurate quantification of the current population size is required.
Trend justification: The species has suffered catastrophic declines and local extinctions in the past (Keith et al. 2003, Latta et al. 2006). Observational records (per eBird 2023) however suggest that these declines have ceased, and that the species is now expanding and recolonising areas of its former range on Hispaniola. Even though the population trend has not been quantified the suspected rapid declines that the species underwent in the past are considered sufficiently recent with reports of declines ongoing until 2009 at least (see Marzluff 2020) and previously severe to still apply within the past long three-generation period of 17.5 years. Over the past three generations (17.5 years) therefore, declines of 30-49% are suspected to have taken place. It is not clear when exactly declines slowed, but based on the number of observational records (per eBird 2023) this may have occurred only recently, during the past 5-10 years. Based on the observed range expansions the species is inferred to be currently increasing, though the rate is not known. The reasons for the apparent population increase are unclear, but it is suspected that rates of persecution and hunting must have reduced. However, rates of forest cover loss are moderately high within the range of the species (c. 10% over the past three generations) and have accelerated in recent years such that if projected forwards the future rate of loss is equivalent to 15% (Global Forest Watch 2023; using data from Hansen et al. [2013] and methods disclosed therein). Given that the species is forest dependent, the extent to which the apparent recovery can reverse previous losses is uncertain.
Country/territory distribution
Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBA)
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Species factsheet: White-necked Crow Corvus leucognaphalus. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/white-necked-crow-corvus-leucognaphalus on 22/11/2024.
Recommended citation for factsheets for more than one species: BirdLife International (2024) IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/search on 22/11/2024.