Current view: Data table and detailed info
Taxonomic source(s)
del Hoyo, J., Collar, N.J., Christie, D.A., Elliott, A. and Fishpool, L.D.C. 2014. HBW and BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World. Volume 1: Non-passerines. Lynx Edicions BirdLife International, Barcelona, Spain and Cambridge, UK.
IUCN Red List criteria met and history
Red List criteria met
Red List history
Migratory status |
not a migrant |
Forest dependency |
high |
Land-mass type |
shelf island
|
Average mass |
- |
Population justification: The population size of this species has long been considered moderately small with McGowan et al. (1995) and Li Xiangtao (1996) both considering the species to number (perhaps much) less than 10,000 individuals. Surveys undertaken in the 1990s at Bawangling Nature Reserve led to a calculated density of 6-8 birds/km2, which was then extrapolated to produced a total estimate of 3,900-5,200 birds across an area of c.650 km2 (BirdLife International 2001). There is however evidence that Bawangling may host higher densities of Arborophila ardens than other sites. At Nanweiling Nature Reserve, for example, the species' density was calculated in 1990 as only 2.59 birds/km2. Moreover, tagged birds at Bangwangling had smaller home ranges (3.87±0.42, n=13 individuals) than those at another site, Yinggeling Nature Reserve (7.70±1.04, n=9 individuals), implying the former site may host the species at a higher density; thus, the use of 6-8 birds/km2 across the species' entire range may generate a population size scenario that is overly optimistic.
There is approximately 1,200 km2 of suitable habitat within this species' elevational range (the value used in BirdLife International [2001] was too pessimistic). To this densities of 3-8 birds/km2 are applied reflecting the uncertainty discussed above, leading to a population size of 3,600-9,600, rounded here to 2,500-9,999 reflecting some additional uncertainty regarding the number of mature individuals (vs individuals, which includes juveniles etc.).
Trend justification: Historically, this species has lost significant areas of suitable habitat in response to forest loss, and is no longer found at some localities it once occupied (BirdLife International 2001). Declines are inferred to be ongoing due to continued (albeit slowing) forest loss, which has continued to occur at the lowest elevations of its altitudinal range (Global Forest Watch 2024). The rate of decline is not set here, given considerable uncertainty about this species' tolerances (it has been described as being highly dependent on closed-canopy forest [BirdLife International 2001, Yang et al. 2023] and also tolerant of logged forest [Lewthwaite et al. 2021]), and the absence of data on the impact of hunting and egg-collecting (Rao et al. 2017). Nonetheless, given it is apparently able to persist in heavily-hunted landscapes (Lewthwaite et al. 2021), it is likely the species is declining only slowly.
Country/territory distribution
Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBA)
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Species factsheet: Hainan Partridge Arborophila ardens. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/hainan-partridge-arborophila-ardens on 23/11/2024.
Recommended citation for factsheets for more than one species: BirdLife International (2024) IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/search on 23/11/2024.