Taxonomic note
Pseudastur occidentalis (del Hoyo and Collar 2014) was previously placed in the genus Leucopternis.
Taxonomic source(s)
del Hoyo, J., Collar, N.J., Christie, D.A., Elliott, A. and Fishpool, L.D.C. 2014. HBW and BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World. Volume 1: Non-passerines. Lynx Edicions BirdLife International, Barcelona, Spain and Cambridge, UK.
SACC. 2005 and updates. A classification of the bird species of South America. Available at: https://www.museum.lsu.edu/~Remsen/SACCBaseline.htm.
Critically Endangered | Endangered | Vulnerable |
---|---|---|
- | - | C2a(ii) |
Year | Category | Criteria |
---|---|---|
2024 | Vulnerable | C2a(ii) |
2016 | Endangered | C2a(i) |
2012 | Endangered | C2a(i) |
2008 | Endangered | C2a(i) |
2004 | Endangered | |
2000 | Endangered | |
1996 | Endangered | |
1994 | Endangered | |
1988 | Threatened |
Migratory status | not a migrant | Forest dependency | high |
Land-mass type |
continent |
Average mass | - |
Estimate | Data quality | |
---|---|---|
Extent of Occurrence (breeding/resident) | 112,170 km2 | medium |
Severely fragmented? | no | - |
Estimate | Data quality | Derivation | Year of estimate | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Population size | 2500-10000,2600 mature individuals | poor | estimated | 2023 |
Population trend | decreasing | poor | inferred | 2017-2040 |
Rate of change over the past 10 years/3 generations (longer of the two periods) | 1-19% | - | - | - |
Rate of change over the past & future 10 years/3 generations (longer of the two periods) | 1-9% | - | - | - |
Generation length | 7.52 years | - | - | - |
Number of subpopulations | 1 | - | - | - |
Percentage of mature individuals in largest subpopulation | 100% | - | - | - |
Population justification: Based on transect counts in different forest types in northwest Peru, the population density was calculated at 0.65 individuals/km2 (Piana 2016). Within the range, a total of c.24,000 km2 are covered by forest (Global Forest Watch 2023, using Hansen et al. [2013] data and methods therein). To account for the species' patchy distribution (see eBird 2023) and for the fact that many forest patches are too small and remote to offer suitable habitat (see Global Forest Watch 2023), it is precautionarily assumed that only 25% of forested habitat are occupied at this density (i.e., 6,000 km2). The global population may consequently number 3,900 individuals, which equates to 2,600 mature individuals. To account for uncertainty it is assumed that up to a potential maximum of 75% of forests may be occupied, giving an upper bound of 11,700 individuals or 7,800 mature individuals. Given the patchy nature of records and the species' general scarcity throughout the range the best estimate is set at the lower occupancy threshold and the population is estimated at between 2,500-8,000 with a best single value of 2,600 mature individuals.
Trend justification: This species is inferred to be declining as a consequence of habitat destruction and fragmentation; moreover, it is locally persecuted due to attacks on poultry. Blandariz et al. (2023) conducted analysis of expert responses on species change in western Ecuador and gave the species the highest score for 'retraction', corresponding to statements reporting loss from formerly occupied sites. Up until the 1980s, deforestation in western Ecuador proceeded rapidly at a rate of 57% per decade (Dodson and Gentry 1991), so that now mostly small fragments remain (see Global Forest Watch 2023). Forest loss has however since slowed and tree cover was lost at a rate of 9% over the past three generations (22.6 years), but from 2017 onward this slowed further to a rate equivalent to 4% over three generations (Global Forest Watch 2023, using Hansen et al. [2013] data and methods disclosed therein). Even considering the species' dependence on deciduous forests, and accounting for additional impacts of habitat degradation and fragmentation as well as hunting, population declines are likely slow. They are here tentatively placed in the band 1-19% over the past three generations, and slowing to 1-9% over three generations from 2017 onward.
Country/Territory | Presence | Origin | Resident | Breeding visitor | Non-breeding visitor | Passage migrant |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ecuador | extant | native | yes | |||
Peru | extant | native | yes |
Country/Territory | IBA Name |
---|---|
Ecuador | Abras de Mantequilla |
Ecuador | Alamor-Celica |
Ecuador | Bosque Protector Cerro Blanco |
Ecuador | Bosque Protector Cerro Pata de Pájaro |
Ecuador | Bosque Protector Chongón-Colonche |
Ecuador | Bosque Protector Jatumpamba-Jorupe |
Ecuador | Bosque Protector Molleturo Mullopungo |
Ecuador | Cañón del río Catamayo |
Ecuador | Cazaderos-Mangaurquillo |
Ecuador | Centro Científico Río Palenque |
Ecuador | Cerro de Hayas-Naranjal |
Ecuador | Cerro Mutiles |
Ecuador | Daucay |
Ecuador | Hacienda Camarones |
Ecuador | La Tagua |
Ecuador | Mache Chindul Ecological Reserve and surrouding areas (Reserva Ecológica Mache-Chindul IBA) |
Ecuador | Parque Nacional Machalilla y alrededores |
Ecuador | Reserva Biológica Tito Santos |
Ecuador | Reserva Buenaventura |
Ecuador | Reserva Ecológica Comunal Loma Alta |
Ecuador | Reserva Ecológica Manglares-Churute y Canal de Jambelí |
Ecuador | Reserva Natural Tumbesia-La Ceiba-Zapotillo |
Peru | Parque Nacional Cerros de Amotape |
Habitat (level 1) | Habitat (level 2) | Importance | Occurrence |
---|---|---|---|
Forest | Subtropical/Tropical Dry | major | resident |
Forest | Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland | major | resident |
Altitude | 0 - 2900 m | Occasional altitudinal limits |
Threat (level 1) | Threat (level 2) | Impact and Stresses | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Agriculture & aquaculture | Annual & perennial non-timber crops - Small-holder farming | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Majority (50-90%) | Slow, Significant Declines | Medium Impact: 6 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Agriculture & aquaculture | Livestock farming & ranching - Small-holder grazing, ranching or farming | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Majority (50-90%) | Slow, Significant Declines | Medium Impact: 6 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Biological resource use | Hunting & trapping terrestrial animals - Persecution/control | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Slow, Significant Declines | Low Impact: 5 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Biological resource use | Logging & wood harvesting - Unintentional effects: (subsistence/small scale) [harvest] | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Slow, Significant Declines | Low Impact: 5 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Residential & commercial development | Housing & urban areas | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Negligible declines | Low Impact: 4 | ||||||
|
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Species factsheet: Grey-backed Hawk Pseudastur occidentalis. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/grey-backed-hawk-pseudastur-occidentalis on 23/12/2024.
Recommended citation for factsheets for more than one species: BirdLife International (2024) IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/search on 23/12/2024.