NT
Black-winged Lory Eos cyanogenia



Taxonomy

Taxonomic source(s)
del Hoyo, J., Collar, N.J., Christie, D.A., Elliott, A. and Fishpool, L.D.C. 2014. HBW and BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World. Volume 1: Non-passerines. Lynx Edicions BirdLife International, Barcelona, Spain and Cambridge, UK.

IUCN Red List criteria met and history
Red List criteria met
Critically Endangered Endangered Vulnerable
- - -

Red List history
Year Category Criteria
2022 Near Threatened B1ab(iii,v)
2016 Vulnerable C2a(ii)
2013 Vulnerable C2a(ii)
2012 Vulnerable C2a(ii)
2008 Vulnerable C2a(ii)
2004 Vulnerable
2000 Vulnerable
1996 Vulnerable
1994 Vulnerable
1988 Threatened
Species attributes

Migratory status not a migrant Forest dependency medium
Land-mass type Average mass 167 g
Range

Estimate Data quality
Extent of Occurrence (breeding/resident) 10,800 km2 medium
Number of locations 12-39 -
Severely fragmented? no -
Population
Estimate Data quality Derivation Year of estimate
Population size unknown poor - -
Population trend decreasing poor inferred 2016-2037
Rate of change over the past 10 years/3 generations (longer of the two periods) 1-9% - - -
Rate of change over the future 10 years/3 generations (longer of the two periods) 1-9% - - -
Rate of change over the past & future 10 years/3 generations (longer of the two periods) 1-9% - - -
Generation length 7 years - - -
Number of subpopulations 1-4,2 - - -
Percentage of mature individuals in largest subpopulation 1-89% - - -

Population justification: The species is generally common on the island of Biak (Beehler and Pratt 2016), despite reports of abundance having declined between 1982 and 1995 (K. D. Bishop in litt. 2000). There are no published estimates of population or density for Black-winged Lory. The plausible range of population can be inferred from the densities of congeners and the area of forest habitat within the range of the species. Other species in the genus Eos have been studied on a number of islands with an average abundance of 47 individuals per km2 (from 28 reported density estimates: Santini et al. 2018). The area of forest within the range (Biak and surrounding small islands, Numfor Manim and Num) totals 1,756 km2 (extracted from the GlobCover 2 land cover layer [Arino et al. 2012]).  If half of the area were to be occupied at the average density reported for Eos lories, the population would be 41,317 individuals, with the 25-75 percentile range of densities giving a range of 11,743-67,386 individuals. This indicative population size suggests that the species is likely to exceed the threshold for listing as threatened under the small and declining population size criterion.

While individuals and groups move extensively in the search for fruiting and flowering trees, these movements are similar to those undertaken by other members of the genus, and are of small scale hence are not considered to represent genuine nomadic movements. As such, while the species is obviously capable of crossing stretches of sea to reach other islands, it is plausible that there are up to four subpopulations, and two is the most likely number (Numfor and Biak/Supiori with the minor islands).

Trend justification: Previously, rapid reductions in the abundance of the species were noted due to high levels of trapping on Biak (K.D. Bishop in litt. 2000). In the past few years there are once again reports of high trapping rates impacting the Biak population (Bergmark 2019, M. Halaouate in litt. 2022). As such, the number of mature individuals is again inferred to be declining. Trapping does not appear to be a significant problem elsewhere in the range and the species remains much commoner on Numfor than it is now on Biak (M. Halaouate in litt. 2022). The maximum rate of forest cover loss have been 6.3% over the past three generations (data from Global Forest Watch 2021, using Hansen et al. [2013] data and methods disclosed therein). The species is tolerant of forest degradation and utilises tree crops and secondary forest, hence it is unclear whether this rate of forest cover loss would cause an equivalent rate of population reduction, however it is judged likely that this level of forest cover loss would lead to a reduction in the available habitat for the species, as well as a decline in habitat quality and potentially correlates with greater trapping access to previously safe parts of Biak.
Accordingly, the species is inferred to be suffering a continuing decline in the number of mature individuals. Based on a) the species having some tolerance for forest loss, hence assuming a population impact that is half the rate of the estimated forest loss rate, and b) the impact of trapping adding at least 5% to the rate of population reduction over three generations, a suspected rate of reduction is tentatively placed within the range of 1-9% over the past three generations, and currently this is the rate that is suspected to continue into the future. However, there is a need for an urgent investigation to quantify the current impact of trapping on all targeted species on these islands, and reports of reduced abundance on islands aside from Biak will lead to the suspicion that rates of reduction may be higher.


Country/territory distribution
Country/Territory Presence Origin Resident Breeding visitor Non-breeding visitor Passage migrant
Indonesia extant native yes

Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBA)
Country/Territory IBA Name

Habitats & altitude
Habitat (level 1) Habitat (level 2) Importance Occurrence
Artificial/Terrestrial Plantations suitable non-breeding
Forest Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland major resident
Altitude 0 - 460 m Occasional altitudinal limits  

Threats & impact
Threat (level 1) Threat (level 2) Impact and Stresses
Agriculture & aquaculture Annual & perennial non-timber crops - Small-holder farming Timing Scope Severity Impact
Ongoing Minority (<50%) Slow, Significant Declines Low Impact: 5
Stresses
Ecosystem degradation, Ecosystem conversion
Biological resource use Hunting & trapping terrestrial animals - Intentional use (species is the target) Timing Scope Severity Impact
Ongoing Minority (<50%) Rapid Declines Medium Impact: 6
Stresses
Reduced reproductive success, Species mortality
Biological resource use Logging & wood harvesting - Unintentional effects: (subsistence/small scale) [harvest] Timing Scope Severity Impact
Ongoing Minority (<50%) Slow, Significant Declines Low Impact: 5
Stresses
Ecosystem degradation, Ecosystem conversion
Residential & commercial development Commercial & industrial areas Timing Scope Severity Impact
Future Minority (<50%) Negligible declines No/Negligible Impact: 2
Stresses
Ecosystem degradation, Ecosystem conversion

Utilisation
Purpose Scale
Pets/display animals, horticulture international
Sport hunting/specimen collecting international

Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Species factsheet: Black-winged Lory Eos cyanogenia. Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/black-winged-lory-eos-cyanogenia on 23/11/2024.
Recommended citation for factsheets for more than one species: BirdLife International (2024) IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/search on 23/11/2024.