The site was identified as important in 2004 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Swamp Francolin Ortygornis gularis | NT | resident | 2004 | present | A1, A3 |
Sarus Crane Grus antigone | VU | resident | 2004 | present | A1 |
Lesser Adjutant Leptoptilos javanicus | NT | resident | 2004 | present | A1 |
Sociable Lapwing Vanellus gregarius | CR | winter | 2004 | present | A1 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2004) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2004. The most recent assessment (2003) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2003 | not assessed | high | not assessed |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | unset | good |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Natural system modifications | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | low |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | low |
Transportation and service corridors | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Not assessed | Not assessed | Not assessed | not assessed |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1978 | Valmiki | Sanctuary | 62 |
1978 | Udaipur | Sanctuary | <1 |
1989 | Valmiki | National Park | 38 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | - | |
Grassland | - | |
Wetlands (inland) | - |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
forestry | - |
nature conservation and research | - |
water management | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Valmiki Tiger Reserve and Saraiyaman Lake (India). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/valmiki-tiger-reserve-and-saraiyaman-lake-iba-india on 22/11/2024.