The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2011 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List | Season (year/s of estimate) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|
Eurasian Curlew Numenius arquata | NT | winter (2008) | min 219 birds | A1, C1 |
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2011. The most recent assessment (2007) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2007 | very poor | high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | population | poor |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Actual vs Reference (units) | % remaining | Result | ||
European Shag Gulosus aristotelis | 2 / 26 (pairs) | 8 | very poor | ||
Larus cachinnans | 32 / 500 (pairs) | 7 | very poor |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | most of population/area (50–90%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | high |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | moderate decline (10–30% over 3 generations) | high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
Natural system modifications | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
Pollution | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
Climate change and severe weather | likely in long term (>4 years) | most of population/area (50–90%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
Transportation and service corridors | happening now | few individuals/small area (<10%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Designation | Planning | Action | Result |
Most of area (50–90%) covered (including the most critical parts for important bird species) | No management plan exists, but the management planning process has begun | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation (management category) | % coverage of IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1986 | Dunas de Liencres | Parque Natural (V) | 100 |
1988 | Oyambre | Parque Natural (V) | 61 |
Habitat | % of IBA | Habitat detail |
---|---|---|
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | - | |
Marine Intertidal | - | |
Marine Neritic | - |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
agriculture | 80 |
fisheries/aquaculture | 10 |
not utilised | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Tina Menor-Sarnosa island-Oyambre (Spain). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/tina-menor-sarnosa-island-oyambre-iba-spain on 27/12/2024.