PL110
Solska Forest


IBA Justification

The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2010 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.

Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:
Species Red List Season (year/s of estimate) Size IBA criteria
Western Capercaillie Tetrao urogallus LC breeding (2006–2009) 50–60 males C6
European Nightjar Caprimulgus europaeus LC breeding (2006–2007) 100–360 pairs C6
Corncrake Crex crex LC breeding (2006–2009) 150 males C1
Spotted Crake Porzana porzana LC breeding (2004–2008) 10–30 males C6
Black Stork Ciconia nigra LC breeding (2005–2008) 20–30 pairs C6
Boreal Owl Aegolius funereus LC breeding (2009) 33–35 pairs C6
Ural Owl Strix uralensis LC breeding (2006–2009) 13–14 pairs C6
Eurasian Eagle-owl Bubo bubo LC breeding (2006–2009) 8–10 pairs C6
European Honey-buzzard Pernis apivorus LC breeding (2006–2009) 65–80 pairs C6
Lesser Spotted Eagle Clanga pomarina LC breeding (2006–2009) 33–36 pairs C6
Black Woodpecker Dryocopus martius LC breeding (2009) 400–800 pairs C6
Woodlark Lullula arborea LC breeding (2006–2009) 1,000–1,500 pairs C6
Barred Warbler Curruca nisoria LC breeding (2005–2009) 100–200 pairs C6

IBA Conservation

Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2010. The most recent assessment (2009) is shown below.

IBA conservation assessment
Year of assessment State Pressure Response
2009 moderate very high medium
Whole site assessed? State assessed by Accuracy of information
yes population medium

State (condition of the trigger species' populations)
Species Actual vs Reference (units) % remaining Result
Corncrake Crex crex 150 / 120 (males) 100 good
Black Stork Ciconia nigra 30 / 30 (pairs) 100 good
Boreal Owl Aegolius funereus 35 / 15 (pairs) 100 good
Ural Owl Strix uralensis 14 / 8 (pairs) 100 good
Eurasian Eagle-owl Bubo bubo 10 / 5 (pairs) 100 good
European Honey-buzzard Pernis apivorus 80 / 80 (pairs) 100 good
Lesser Spotted Eagle Clanga pomarina 36 / 40 (pairs) 90 moderate
Woodlark Lullula arborea 1,500 / 1,500 (pairs) 100 good
Barred Warbler Curruca nisoria 200 / 200 (pairs) 100 good

State (condition of the trigger species' habitats)
Habitat Quantity (% remaining) Quality (% carrying capacity) Result
Grassland poor (40–69%) poor (40–69%) very poor
Wetlands (inland) poor (40–69%) poor (40–69%) very poor
Forest moderate (70–90%) moderate (70–90%) poor

Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Threat Timing Scope Severity Result
Human intrusions and disturbance happe­ning now whole of popul­ation/area (>90%) moderate decline (10–30% over 3 gener­ations) very high
Natural system modifications happe­ning now most of popul­ation/area (50–90%) moderate decline (10–30% over 3 gener­ations) high
Agricultural expansion and intensification happe­ning now most of popul­ation/area (50–90%) moderate decline (10–30% over 3 gener­ations) high
Invasive and other problematic species and genes happe­ning now most of popul­ation/area (50–90%) moderate decline (10–30% over 3 gener­ations) high
Transportation and service corridors happe­ning now most of popul­ation/area (50–90%) slow decline (1–10% over 3 gener­ations) high
Residential and commercial development happe­ning now most of popul­ation/area (50–90%) slow decline (1–10% over 3 gener­ations) high
Biological resource use happe­ning now some of popul­ation/area (10–49%) slow decline (1–10% over 3 gener­ations) medium
Pollution happe­ning now some of popul­ation/area (10–49%) slow decline (1–10% over 3 gener­ations) medium
Energy production and mining likely in long term (>4 years) most of popul­ation/area (50–90%) moderate decline (10–30% over 3 gener­ations) medium
No known threats happe­ning now few indivi­duals/small area (<10%) no or slight decline (<1% over 3 gener­ations) low

Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Designation Planning Action Result
Whole area (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation A management plan exists, but it is out of date or not compre­hensive Substantive conservation measures are being implemented, but these are not compre­hensive and are limited by resources and capacity medium

IBA Protection

Year Protected Area Designation (management category) % coverage of IBA
1958 Czartowe Pole Rezerwat Przyrody (IV) <1
1958 Nad Tanwią Rezerwat Przyrody (IV) <1
1958 Szum Rezerwat Przyrody (IV) <1
1975 Obary Rezerwat Przyrody (IV) <1
1988 Park Krajobrazowy Puszczy Solskiej Park Krajobrazowy (V) 37
1991 Szczebrzeszyński Park Krajobrazowy Park Krajobrazowy (V) 2
1998 Bukowy Las Rezerwat Przyrody (IV) <1

Habitats

Habitat % of IBA Habitat detail
Forest 85 Native coniferous woodland
Grassland 10
Wetlands (inland) 5 Standing freshwater; Rivers and streams

Land use

Land use % of IBA
forestry 85
agriculture 10
water management 5
hunting -


Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Solska Forest (Poland). Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/solska-forest-iba-poland on 23/12/2024.