The site was identified as important in 2004 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Middendorff's Grasshopper-warbler Helopsaltes ochotensis | LC | breeding | 2003 | present | A3 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2004) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2004. The most recent assessment (2015) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2015 | near favourable | high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | habitat | - |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | good (> 90%) | moderate (70-90%) | near favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Energy production and mining | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Pollution | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Geological events | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Most of site (50-90%) covered (including the most critical parts for important bird species) | No management planning has taken place | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1949 | Shikotsu toya | 国立公園 | 86 |
1972 | Horobetsu dam | 都道府県指定鳥獣保護区 | 1 |
1974 | Toyako | 都道府県指定鳥獣保護区 | 6 |
1981 | Kuttarako | 都道府県指定鳥獣保護区 | 1 |
1981 | Jozankei | 都道府県指定鳥獣保護区 | <1 |
1983 | Shikotsuko monbetsudake | 都道府県指定鳥獣保護区 | <1 |
1984 | Poroto | 都道府県指定鳥獣保護区 | <1 |
1986 | Shikotsuko | 都道府県指定鳥獣保護区 | 19 |
1989 | Hokudai ichinosawa | 都道府県指定鳥獣保護区 | <1 |
1996 | Area around Mt. Izaridake | 森林生態系保護地域 | 3 |
2001 | Shikotsu and Muine | 緑の回廊 | 4 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | - | |
Wetlands (inland) | Freshwater lakes and pools | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Shikotsu, Toya (Japan). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/shikotsu-toya-iba-japan on 23/11/2024.