The site was identified as important in 2011 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Griffon Vulture Gyps fulvus | LC | resident | 2009 | 216 breeding pairs | B1iii, C2 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2011) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2011. The most recent assessment (2007) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2007 | favourable | high | high |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | population | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
Griffon Vulture Gyps fulvus | 92 | 128 | breeding pairs | 100 | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Natural system modifications | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | high |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1985 | Cañón del Río Lobos | Parque Natural | 96 |
1988 | Cañón del Río Lobos - ZEPA | Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) | 84 |
1996 | Monte Santiago | Monumento Natural | 94 |
1998 | Cañón del Río Lobos | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 94 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks) | Inland cliffs | 26 |
Shrubland | Scrub, Sclerophyllous scrub, garrigue and maquis | 26 |
Artificial/Terrestrial | Forestry plantations | - |
Forest | Alluvial and very wet forest, Broadleaved evergreen woodland | - |
Grassland | Humid grasslands | - |
Wetlands (inland) | Rivers and streams | - |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
agriculture | 26 |
nature conservation and research | 26 |
forestry | - |
not utilised | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: River Lobos canyon (Spain). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/river-lobos-canyon-iba-spain on 23/11/2024.