The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2008 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2008. The most recent assessment (1990) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
1990 | not assessed | very high | not assessed |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | unset | medium |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Transportation and service corridors | likely in short term (<4 years) | whole of population/area (>90%) | rapid decline (>30% over 3 generations) | very high |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | moderate decline (10–30% over 3 generations) | high |
Energy production and mining | likely in short term (<4 years) | most of population/area (50–90%) | moderate decline (10–30% over 3 generations) | high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
Pollution | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | few individuals/small area (<10%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | low |
Climate change and severe weather | happening now | few individuals/small area (<10%) | no or slight decline (<1% over 3 generations) | low |
Residential and commercial development | likely in long term (>4 years) | few individuals/small area (<10%) | no or slight decline (<1% over 3 generations) | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Designation | Planning | Action | Result |
Not assessed | Not assessed | Not assessed | not assessed |
Year | Protected Area | Designation (management category) | % coverage of IBA |
---|---|---|---|
2017 | Complejo de Humedales Cuyabeno Lagartococha Yasuní | Ramsar Site, Wetland of International Importance (II) | 62 |
Habitat | % of IBA | Habitat detail |
---|---|---|
Forest | major (>10) | Flooded tropical evergreen forest; Palm forest; River-edge (river island) forest; Tropical lowland evergreen forest; Second-growth or disturbed forest; Gallery (or Riparian) forest |
Wetlands (inland) | major (>10) | Freshwater lakes and pools; Freshwater marshes/swamps; Riverine floodplains; Rivers; Streams |
Artificial/Terrestrial | minor (<10) | Improved pasture land; Perennial crops, orchards, groves |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
nature conservation and research | major (>10) |
fisheries/aquaculture | minor (<10) |
tourism/recreation | minor (<10) |
hunting | minor (<10) |
military | minor (<10) |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Reserva de Producción Faunística Cuyabeno (Ecuador). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/reserva-de-producción-faunística-cuyabeno-iba-ecuador on 23/12/2024.