The site was identified as important in 2000 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whooper Swan Cygnus cygnus | LC | passage | 1997 | 400 individuals | B1i, C2 |
White-tailed Sea-eagle Haliaeetus albicilla | LC | passage | 1997 | 10-15 individuals | A1, C1 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2000) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2000. The most recent assessment (2010) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2010 | favourable | high | high |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | population | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
Whooper Swan Cygnus cygnus | 400 | 400 | individuals | 100 | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Pollution | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Natural system modifications | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | The conservation measures needed for the site are being comprehensively and effectively implemented | high |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1993 | Puurijärven ja Isonsuon kansallispuisto | Kansallispuisto | 73 |
1995 | Puurijärvi-Isosuo | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 80 |
1996 | Kokemäenjoki | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 1 |
1998 | Puurijärvi - Isosuo | Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) | 86 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Wetlands (inland) | Standing freshwater, Raised bogs | 91 |
Artificial/Terrestrial | 7 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
not utilised | 90 |
agriculture | 7 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Puurijärvi-Isosuo wetlands (Finland). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/puurijärvi-isosuo-wetlands-iba-finland on 23/11/2024.