• Summary
• Text account
• Data table and detailed info
• Map
• Reference and further resources

The site was identified as important in 2002 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.

Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:

Species	Red List1	Season	Year(s)	Size	IBA criteria
Sumba Green-pigeon Treron teysmannii	NT	resident	2000	present	A2
Red-naped Fruit-dove Ptilinopus dohertyi	VU	resident	2004	present	A1, A2
Sumba Buttonquail Turnix everetti	LC	resident	2004	present	A1, A2
Sumba Boobook Ninox rudolfi	NT	resident	2000	present	A2
Sumba Hornbill Rhyticeros everetti	EN	resident	2004	present	A1, A2
Cinnamon-banded Kingfisher Todiramphus australasia	LC	resident	2000	present	A2
Citron-crested Cockatoo Cacatua citrinocristata	CR	resident	2004	present	A1
Sumba Cicadabird Edolisoma dohertyi	LC	resident	2000	present	A2
Yellow-spectacled White-eye Heleia wallacei	LC	resident	2000	present	A2
Chestnut-backed Thrush Geokichla dohertyi	NT	resident	2000	present	A2
Sumba Warbling-flycatcher Eumyias stresemanni	LC	resident	2000	present	A2
Sumba Flycatcher Ficedula harterti	LC	resident	2000	present	A2
Apricot-breasted Sunbird Cinnyris buettikoferi	LC	resident	2000	present	A2

1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2002) may differ.

Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2002. The most recent assessment (2007) is shown below.

State (condition of the trigger species' populations)
Species	Reference	Actual	Units	% remaining	Result
Sumba Hornbill Rhyticeros everetti	8,289	6,402	individuals	78	near favourable
Cacatua sulphurea	614	56	individuals	10	very unfavourable

State (condition of the trigger species' habitats)
Habitat	Quantity (% remaining)	Quality (% carrying capacity)	Result
Forest	moderate (70-90%)	moderate (70-90%)	unfavourable

Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Threat	Timing	Scope	Severity	Result
Agricultural expansion and intensification	happening now	some of area/population (10-49%)	slow but significant deterioration	medium
Invasive and other problematic species and genes	happening now	some of area/population (10-49%)	slow but significant deterioration	medium
Climate change and severe weather	happening now	some of area/population (10-49%)	slow but significant deterioration	medium
Transportation and service corridors	happening now	small area/few individuals (<10%)	slow but significant deterioration	low
Biological resource use	past (and unlikely to return) and no longer limiting	small area/few individuals (<10%)	no or imperceptible deterioration	low

Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Protected areas	Management plan	Other action	Result
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation	A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species	Some limited conservation initiatives are in place	medium

Year	Protected Area	Designation	% overlap with IBA
-	Manupeu Tanadaru	Taman Nasional	100
-	Manupeu	Protection Forest	8
1992	Gunung Langgaliru	Nature Reserve	7

Habitat1	Habitat detail	% of IBA
Forest		68
Wetlands (inland)		-

1. IUCN Habitat classification.

Land use	% of IBA
nature conservation and research	-

---

Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Manupeu Tanadaru (Indonesia). Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/manupeu-tanadaru-iba-indonesia on 23/11/2024.