The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2021 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List | Season (year/s of estimate) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|
Brent Goose Branta bernicla | LC | non-breeding (2013–2021) | 171–390 birds | B3a, C3 |
Pink-footed Goose Anser brachyrhynchus | LC | non-breeding (2013–2019) | 900–8,590 birds | A4, B3a, C3 |
Red-breasted Merganser Mergus serrator | LC | non-breeding (2013–2018) | 906–10,230 birds | A4, B1b, B3a, C3 |
Eurasian Spoonbill Platalea leucorodia | LC | non-breeding (2018) | 255 birds | B3a, C2 |
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2021. The most recent assessment (2019) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2019 | not assessed | very high | not assessed |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | unset | - |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Pollution | happening now | whole of population/area (>90%) | rapid decline (>30% over 3 generations) | very high |
Biological resource use | happening now | whole of population/area (>90%) | rapid decline (>30% over 3 generations) | very high |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | whole of population/area (>90%) | rapid decline (>30% over 3 generations) | very high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Designation | Planning | Action | Result |
Whole area (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | No management plan exists, but the management planning process has begun | Very little or no conservation action taking place | not assessed |
Year | Protected Area | Designation (management category) | % coverage of IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1977 | Livø | Fredet ved afgørelse, exl. Kirkeomgivelser (IV) | 1 |
1992 | Vesthimmerlands Kommune | §3 beskyttet natur (alle søer, moser, vandløb, heder, enge mv) (IV) | 1 |
1992 | Morsø Kommune | §3 beskyttet natur (alle søer, moser, vandløb, heder, enge mv) (IV) | <1 |
Habitat | % of IBA | Habitat detail |
---|---|---|
Marine Intertidal | major (>10) | |
Marine Neritic | major (>10) | |
Artificial/Terrestrial | minor (<10) | Highly improved re-seeded landscapes; Arable land |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
unknown | 100 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Løgstør Bredning (Denmark). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/løgstør-bredning-iba-denmark on 25/12/2024.