FI011
Luosto


IBA Justification

The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2000 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.

Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:
Species Red List Season (year/s of estimate) Size IBA criteria
Jack Snipe Lymnocryptes minimus LC breeding (1996) 5–10 pairs A3
Common Greenshank Tringa nebularia LC breeding (1996) 4–5 pairs A3
Northern Hawk-owl Surnia ulula LC breeding (1996) 6–10 pairs A3
Siberian Jay Perisoreus infaustus LC resident (1996) 20–50 pairs A3
Siberian Tit Poecile cinctus LC resident (1996) 20–50 pairs A3
Arctic Warbler Phylloscopus borealis LC breeding (1996) present A3
Bohemian Waxwing Bombycilla garrulus LC breeding (1996) 1–11 pairs A3
Brambling Fringilla montifringilla LC breeding (1996) 500–1,000 pairs A3
Parrot Crossbill Loxia pytyopsittacus LC breeding (1996) 1–11 pairs A3
Two-barred Crossbill Loxia leucoptera LC breeding (1996) 50–100 pairs A3
Rustic Bunting Emberiza rustica VU breeding (1996) 100–200 pairs A3

IBA Conservation

Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2000. The most recent assessment (2010) is shown below.

IBA conservation assessment
Year of assessment State Pressure Response
2010 very poor low medium
Whole site assessed? State assessed by Accuracy of information
yes population medium

State (condition of the trigger species' populations)
Species Actual vs Reference (units) % remaining Result
Jack Snipe Lymnocryptes minimus 10 / 15 (pairs) 67 poor
Common Greenshank Tringa nebularia 15 / 15 (pairs) 100 good
Northern Hawk-owl Surnia ulula 15 / 15 (pairs) 100 good
Siberian Jay Perisoreus infaustus 110 / 110 (pairs) 100 good
Siberian Tit Poecile cinctus 30 / 80 (pairs) 38 very poor
Bohemian Waxwing Bombycilla garrulus 40 / 30 (pairs) 100 good
Brambling Fringilla montifringilla 1,100 / 1,100 (pairs) 100 good
Parrot Crossbill Loxia pytyopsittacus 42 / 50 (pairs) 84 moderate
Rustic Bunting Emberiza rustica 85 / 190 (pairs) 45 poor

Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Threat Timing Scope Severity Result
Energy production and mining likely in long term (>4 years) some of popul­ation/area (10–49%) no or slight decline (<1% over 3 gener­ations) low

Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Designation Planning Action Result
Whole area (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation A management plan exists, but it is out of date or not compre­hensive Some limited conservation initiatives are in place medium

IBA Protection

Year Protected Area Designation (management category) % coverage of IBA
2005 Pyhä-Luoston kansallispuisto Kansallispuisto (II) 96

Habitats

Habitat % of IBA Habitat detail
Forest 70
Wetlands (inland) 30 Raised bogs

Land use

Land use % of IBA
unknown -


Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Luosto (Finland). Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/luosto-iba-finland on 23/12/2024.