The site was identified as important in 2014 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whooper Swan Cygnus cygnus | LC | winter | 2004-2014 | 200-700 individuals | B1i, B3 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2014) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2014. The most recent assessment (2019) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2019 | favourable | high | negligible |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | population | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
Whooper Swan Cygnus cygnus | 700 | 1,100 | individuals | 100 | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Natural system modifications | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Pollution | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | Not assessed | Not assessed | negligible |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1981 | Seimsjøen | Naturreservat | 6 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Wetlands (inland) | Standing freshwater | 100 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
nature conservation and research | 7 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Lake Storsjøen (Norway). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/lake-storsjøen-iba-norway on 23/11/2024.