The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2014 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List | Season (year/s of estimate) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|
Whooper Swan Cygnus cygnus | LC | passage (2003–2013) | 300–700 birds | B1i |
Pink-footed Goose Anser brachyrhynchus | LC | passage (2004–2013) | 2,000–12,000 birds | A4i, B1i |
Horned Grebe Podiceps auritus | VU | breeding (2007–2010) | 44–45 pairs | B1i, B2 |
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2014. The most recent assessment (2020) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2020 | not assessed | low | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | unset | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Actual vs Reference (units) | % remaining | Result | ||
Whooper Swan Cygnus cygnus | 750 / 700 (birds) | 100 | good | ||
Pink-footed Goose Anser brachyrhynchus | 8,000 / 12,000 (birds) | 67 | poor | ||
Horned Grebe Podiceps auritus | 28 / 45 (pairs) | 63 | poor |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | no or slight decline (<1% over 3 generations) | low |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | few individuals/small area (<10%) | no or slight decline (<1% over 3 generations) | low |
Energy production and mining | happening now | few individuals/small area (<10%) | no or slight decline (<1% over 3 generations) | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Designation | Planning | Action | Result |
Unknown | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | Unknown | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation (management category) | % coverage of IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1984 | Lyngås-Lysgård | Dyrefredningsområde (IV) | 4 |
1984 | Lundselvoset | Naturreservat (Ia) | 2 |
1984 | Figgaoset | Dyrefredningsområde (IV) | 1 |
1984 | Lyngås-Klinga Bird Sanctuary | Flora and Fauna Protection Area (-) | 9 |
1984 | Figgaoset | Flora and Fauna Protection Area (-) | 2 |
Habitat | % of IBA | Habitat detail |
---|---|---|
Wetlands (inland) | 98 | Standing freshwater; Water fringe vegetation |
Forest | 2 | Alluvial and very wet forest |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
nature conservation and research | 10 |
tourism/recreation | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Lake Leksdalsvatn (Norway). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/lake-leksdalsvatn-iba-norway on 23/12/2024.