Lake Chatyr-Kul


IBA Justification

The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2010 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.

Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:
Species Red List Season (year/s of estimate) Size IBA criteria
Bar-headed Goose Anser indicus LC breeding (2004) 50–150 pairs A3
Ruddy Shelduck Tadorna ferruginea LC breeding (2004) 300–10,000 pairs A4i
Ferruginous Duck Aythya nyroca NT passage (2004) 200–1,000 birds A1, A4i
Baikal Teal Sibirionetta formosa LC passage (2004) 20–100 birds A1
Great Crested Grebe Podiceps cristatus LC breeding (2004) 500–1,500 pairs A4i
Horned Grebe Podiceps auritus VU passage (2004) 100–500 birds A4i
Black-necked Grebe Podiceps nigricollis LC breeding (2004) 1,000–3,000 pairs A4i
Charadrius mongolus NR breeding (2004) 50–100 pairs A3
Himalayan Griffon Gyps himalayensis NT resident (2004) 1–3 pairs A3
Cinereous Vulture Aegypius monachus NT resident (2004) 1–2 pairs A1
Saker Falcon Falco cherrug EN passage (2004) 2–4 birds A1
Hume's Lark Calandrella acutirostris LC breeding (2004) present A3
Sulphur-bellied Warbler Phylloscopus griseolus LC breeding (2004) present A3
White-winged Redstart Phoenicurus erythrogastrus LC resident (2004) present A3
Altai Accentor Prunella himalayana LC resident (2004) present A3
Alpine Accentor Prunella collaris LC resident (2004) present A3
Brown Accentor Prunella fulvescens LC resident (2004) present A3
Water Pipit Anthus spinoletta LC breeding (2004) present A3

IBA Conservation

Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2010. The most recent assessment (2006) is shown below.

IBA conservation assessment
Year of assessment State Pressure Response
2006 not assessed medium low
Whole site assessed? State assessed by Accuracy of information
no unset unknown

Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Threat Timing Scope Severity Result
Human intrusions and disturbance happe­ning now some of popul­ation/area (10–49%) slow decline (1–10% over 3 gener­ations) medium

Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Designation Planning Action Result
Whole area (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation Unknown Unknown low

IBA Protection

Year Protected Area Designation (management category) % coverage of IBA
1971 Chatyrkul Wildlife Refuge (IV) 100

Habitats

Habitat % of IBA Habitat detail
Wetlands (inland) 100 Standing brackish & salt water; Fens, transition mires & springs; Raised bogs; Rivers & streams; Standing fresh water; Water-fringe vegetation

Land use

Land use % of IBA
nature conservation and research 100
tourism/recreation 10
other -


Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Lake Chatyr-Kul (Kyrgyzstan). Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/lake-chatyr-kul-iba-kyrgyzstan on 23/12/2024.