The site was identified as important in 2000 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Goosander Mergus merganser | LC | passage | 1996 | 1,500-2,000 individuals | B1i, C3 |
Common Reed-warbler Acrocephalus scirpaceus | LC | breeding | 1996 | 110-130 breeding pairs | B3 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2000) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2000. The most recent assessment (2010) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2010 | very unfavourable | high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | population | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
Goosander Mergus merganser | 1,500 | 400 | individuals | 27 | very unfavourable |
Common Reed-warbler Acrocephalus scirpaceus | 110 | 80 | breeding pairs | 73 | not assessed |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Pollution | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Some of site covered (10-49%) | A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1959 | Viikin luonnonsuojelualue | State Nature Reserve | 3 |
1962 | VIIKIN VANHANKAUPUNGINLAH | Yksityinen luonnonsuojelualue | 17 |
1974 | Vanhankaupunginlahti, Laajalahti | Ramsar Site, Wetland of International Importance | 40 |
1989 | Laajalahden luonnonsuojelualue | Valtion luonnonsuojelualue | 14 |
1996 | Vanhankaupunginlahden lintuvesi | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 23 |
1996 | Laajalahden lintuvesi | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 14 |
1998 | Vanhankaupunginlahden lintuvesi | Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) | 23 |
1998 | Laajalahden lintuvesi | Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) | 14 |
2001 | Viikin pähkinäpensaslehto | Suojeltu luontotyyppi | <1 |
2001 | Viikintien pähkinäpensaslehto | Suojeltu luontotyyppi | - |
2005 | Saunalahden luonnonsuojelualue | Yksityinen luonnonsuojelualue | 4 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | 60 | |
Artificial/Terrestrial | Arable land, Other urban and industrial areas | 30 |
Forest | 10 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
tourism/recreation | 50 |
agriculture | 40 |
nature conservation and research | 40 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Laajalahti bay, Vanhankaupunginlahti bay and Viikki (Finland). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/laajalahti-bay-vanhankaupunginlahti-bay-and-viikki-iba-finland on 27/11/2024.