The site was identified as important in 2000 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Red-breasted Goose Branta ruficollis | VU | passage | 1996 | 60 individuals | A1 |
Greater White-fronted Goose Anser albifrons | LC | passage | 1996 | 500,000 individuals | A4i, B1i |
Ruddy Shelduck Tadorna ferruginea | LC | winter | - | 424 individuals | A4i, B1i |
Demoiselle Crane Anthropoides virgo | LC | breeding | 1995 | present | A3 |
Common Crane Grus grus | LC | passage | 1996 | 57,000 individuals | A4i, B1i |
Black-winged Pratincole Glareola nordmanni | NT | breeding | 1995 | present | A3 |
Pallid Harrier Circus macrourus | NT | breeding | 1995 | present | A3 |
A4iv Species group - soaring birds/cranes | n/a | passage | 1996 | 57,000 individuals | A4iv, B1iv |
A4iii Species group - waterbirds | n/a | passage | 1996 | 500,000-999,999 individuals | A4iii |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2000) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2000. The most recent assessment (2017) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2017 | not assessed | high | not assessed |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | unset | good |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Biological resource use | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Not assessed | Not assessed | Not assessed | not assessed |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1921 | Askaniya Nova | National Biosphere Zapovednik | 95 |
1985 | Askaniya-Nova Zapovednik | UNESCO-MAB Biosphere Reserve | 100 |
2004 | Big Chapelsk Depression | Ramsar Site, Wetland of International Importance | - |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Grassland | Steppes and dry calcareous grassland, Humid grasslands | 100 |
Artificial/Terrestrial | Urban parks and gardens | - |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
nature conservation and research | 100 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Askania-Nova Biosphere Reserve (Ukraine). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/askania-nova-biosphere-reserve-iba-ukraine on 22/11/2024.