The site was identified as important in 2008 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2008) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2008. The most recent assessment (2014) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2014 | favourable | high | medium |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Shrubland | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Grassland | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks) | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Wetlands (inland) | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Artificial/Terrestrial | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Climate change and severe weather | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Natural system modifications | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Transportation and service corridors | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Pollution | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Most of site (50-90%) covered (including the most critical parts for important bird species) | A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | medium |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1926 | Aksu-Dzhabagly | State Nature Reserve | 57 |
2016 | Western Tien-shan | World Heritage Site (natural or mixed) | 61 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Grassland | Alpine, subalpine & boreal, Mesophile grassland & tall grass steppe, Steppes & dry calcareous | 33 |
Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks) | Inland cliffs, Scree, boulders & bare rocky areas | 27 |
Shrubland | Juniper scrub, Low bushes, Scrub | 25 |
Forest | Mixed, Broadleaved deciduous | 6 |
Artificial/Terrestrial | Perennial crops, orchards & groves, Forestry plantations | minor (<10) |
Other | minor (<10) | |
Wetlands (inland) | Water-fringe vegetation, Standing brackish & salt water, Rivers & streams | minor (<10) |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
nature conservation and research | 100 |
tourism/recreation | minor (<10) |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Aksu-Dzhabagly State Nature Reserve (Kazakhstan). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/aksu-dzhabagly-state-nature-reserve-iba-kazakhstan on 22/11/2024.