Taxonomic source(s)
del Hoyo, J., Collar, N.J., Christie, D.A., Elliott, A., Fishpool, L.D.C., Boesman, P. and Kirwan, G.M. 2016. HBW and BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World. Volume 2: Passerines. Lynx Edicions and BirdLife International, Barcelona, Spain and Cambridge, UK.
Critically Endangered | Endangered | Vulnerable |
---|---|---|
- | - | - |
Year | Category | Criteria |
---|---|---|
2024 | Least Concern | |
2016 | Vulnerable | A2ac+3c+4c; C2a(i) |
2013 | Vulnerable | A2ac+3c+4c;C2a(i) |
2012 | Vulnerable | A2ac+3c+4c;C2a(i) |
2008 | Vulnerable | A2c; ; A4c; C1; C2a(i) |
2004 | Vulnerable | |
2000 | Vulnerable | |
1994 | Lower Risk/Near Threatened | |
1988 | Near Threatened |
Migratory status | not a migrant | Forest dependency | medium |
Land-mass type |
continent |
Average mass | - |
Estimate | Data quality | |
---|---|---|
Extent of Occurrence (breeding/resident) | 355,000 km2 | medium |
Severely fragmented? | no | - |
Estimate | Data quality | Derivation | Year of estimate | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Population size | unknown | - | - | - |
Population trend | decreasing | poor | suspected | 2020-2030 |
Rate of change over the past 10 years/3 generations (longer of the two periods) | 0-9% | - | - | - |
Rate of change over the future 10 years/3 generations (longer of the two periods) | 0-15% | - | - | - |
Rate of change over the past & future 10 years/3 generations (longer of the two periods) | 0-15% | - | - | - |
Generation length | 3.38 years | - | - | - |
Number of subpopulations | 1 | - | - | - |
Percentage of mature individuals in largest subpopulation | 100% | - | - | - |
Population justification: Typically considered sparsely distributed but locally common (e.g. Grimmett et al. 1998, Rasmussen and Anderton 2012) and citizen science data indicate that at some sites it is evidently quite common and regularly found (eBird 2024). Within its known range, Jha and Vasudevan (2020a) estimated that there remained approximately 75,000 km2 of suitable habitat, although over 80% of fragments were less than five square kilometres in extent. While there is no density available for this species, it is reasonable to conclude that even if only a small proportion of this habitat is occupied, the species' population size is probably large (and certainly larger than the 10,000 mature individuals estimated by previous evaluations of its extinction risk: IUCN 2016).
Trend justification: The main threat to this species is the loss and degradation of often unprotected scrub and thorn forests. However, the extent of these habitat classes scarcely reduced (<1%) between 2010 and 2020 (data from Jung et al. [2020], analysed by sRedList [2023]) and while degradation of some sites is probably ongoing, there is little evidence to suggest that over the past 10 years (2013-2023) this species has declined rapidly. Accordingly it is suspected of having declined by 0-9%. In the future, suitable habitat extent is suspected to reduce in response to climate change, mostly optimistically by c.5% by 2050 (RCP 2.6) and pessimistically by c.40% by 2070 (RCP 8.5) (scenarios from Table 2: Jha and Vasudevan 2020a). However the timings and mechanisms behind these declines are uncertain and remain to be elucidated by monitoring data. Nonetheless, this should be monitored. Future declines of 0-15% over the next 10 years are therefore suspected, noting that forest loss and degradation may continue at the same pace it has over the past 10 years, and there may be compounding impacts of climate change.
Country/Territory | Presence | Origin | Resident | Breeding visitor | Non-breeding visitor | Passage migrant |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
India | extant | native | yes |
Country/Territory | IBA Name |
---|---|
India | Adichunchunagiri Wildlife Sanctuary |
India | Arabhithittu Wildlife Sanctuary |
India | Bandipur National Park |
India | Bannerghatta National Park |
India | Biligiri Rangaswamy Temple Wildlife Sanctuary and Hills |
India | Cauvery Wildlife Sanctuary |
India | Chinnar Wildlife Sanctuary |
India | Hampi and Daroji Bear Sanctuary |
India | Horsley Hills |
India | Jogimatti Reserve Forest |
India | Kaundinya Wildlife Sanctuary |
India | Melkote Temple Wildlife Sanctuary |
India | Mudumalai National Park |
India | Nandi Hills |
India | Noorukuppalakonda Reserve Forest |
India | Papikonda National Park |
India | Rajiv Ghandi Wildlife Sanctuary (Nagarjunasagar - Srisailam Tiger Reserve) |
India | Ramanagara Reserve Forest |
India | Sri Penusila Narasimha Wildlife Sanctuary |
India | Sri Venkateswara Wildlife Sanctuary and National Park |
Habitat (level 1) | Habitat (level 2) | Importance | Occurrence |
---|---|---|---|
Forest | Subtropical/Tropical Dry | major | resident |
Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks) | major | resident | |
Savanna | Dry | major | resident |
Shrubland | Subtropical/Tropical Dry | major | resident |
Altitude | 300 - 1800 m | Occasional altitudinal limits |
Threat (level 1) | Threat (level 2) | Impact and Stresses | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Agriculture & aquaculture | Annual & perennial non-timber crops - Small-holder farming | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Slow, Significant Declines | Low Impact: 5 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Agriculture & aquaculture | Livestock farming & ranching - Small-holder grazing, ranching or farming | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Slow, Significant Declines | Low Impact: 5 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Biological resource use | Logging & wood harvesting - Unintentional effects: (subsistence/small scale) [harvest] | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Slow, Significant Declines | Low Impact: 5 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Climate change & severe weather | Habitat shifting & alteration | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Whole (>90%) | Unknown | Unknown | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Energy production & mining | Mining & quarrying | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Slow, Significant Declines | Low Impact: 5 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Residential & commercial development | Housing & urban areas | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Slow, Significant Declines | Low Impact: 5 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Transportation & service corridors | Roads & railroads | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Negligible declines | Low Impact: 4 | ||||||
|
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Species factsheet: Yellow-throated Bulbul Pycnonotus xantholaemus. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/yellow-throated-bulbul-pycnonotus-xantholaemus on 23/11/2024.
Recommended citation for factsheets for more than one species: BirdLife International (2024) IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/search on 23/11/2024.