Taxonomic note
Ramphastos vitellinus, R. culminatus, R. citrolaemus and R. ariel (del Hoyo and Collar 2014) were previously lumped as R. vitellinus following SACC (2006) and a review by the BirdLife Taxonomic Working Group, and before then were split as R. vitellinus, R. culminatus and R. citreolaemus following Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993).
Taxonomic source(s)
del Hoyo, J., Collar, N.J., Christie, D.A., Elliott, A. and Fishpool, L.D.C. 2014. HBW and BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World. Volume 1: Non-passerines. Lynx Edicions BirdLife International, Barcelona, Spain and Cambridge, UK.
Critically Endangered | Endangered | Vulnerable |
---|---|---|
- | - | - |
Year | Category | Criteria |
---|---|---|
2022 | Least Concern | |
2016 | Vulnerable | A4cd |
2014 | Vulnerable | A4cd |
2012 | Not Recognised | |
2008 | Not Recognised | |
2004 | Not Recognised | |
2000 | Not Recognised | |
1994 | Not Recognised | |
1988 | Not Recognised |
Migratory status | not a migrant | Forest dependency | high |
Land-mass type | Average mass | - |
Estimate | Data quality | |
---|---|---|
Extent of Occurrence (breeding/resident) | 7,320,000 km2 | medium |
Severely fragmented? | no | - |
Estimate | Data quality | Derivation | Year of estimate | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Population size | unknown | - | - | - |
Population trend | decreasing | - | suspected | 2016-2034 |
Rate of change over the past 10 years/3 generations (longer of the two periods) | 10-19% | - | - | - |
Rate of change over the future 10 years/3 generations (longer of the two periods) | 10-19% | - | - | - |
Rate of change over the past & future 10 years/3 generations (longer of the two periods) | 10-19% | - | - | - |
Generation length | 5.95 years | - | - | - |
Population justification: The population has not been quantified but the species is described as 'fairly common' (Stotz et al. 1996, del Hoyo et al. 2020).
Trend justification: The population trend has not been assessed directly. Due to the impacts of hunting and the species's preference for undisturbed forests, the population is suspected to be in decline. Tree cover within the range is lost at a rate of up to 9% over three generations (17.9 years; Global Forest Watch 2021, using Hansen et al. [2013] data and methods disclosed therein). While the species is described as being less common in logged forests, it also occurs near forest edges, in clearings and in small forest patches in savanna (del Hoyo et al. 2020); therefore, habitat loss is unlikely to drive a significant population decline. The impact of hunting on the population size has not been quantified; however overall, the impacts are likely not large due to the remoteness and inaccessibility of large parts of the range. Tentatively, population declines are here placed in the band 10-19% over three generations, but an accurate quantification of the population trend is required.
Country/Territory | Presence | Origin | Resident | Breeding visitor | Non-breeding visitor | Passage migrant |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bolivia | extant | native | yes | |||
Brazil | extant | native | yes | |||
Colombia | extant | native | yes | |||
Ecuador | extant | native | yes | |||
Peru | extant | native | yes | |||
Venezuela | extant | native | yes |
Country/Territory | IBA Name |
---|
Habitat (level 1) | Habitat (level 2) | Importance | Occurrence |
---|---|---|---|
Forest | Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland | major | resident |
Forest | Subtropical/Tropical Moist Montane | suitable | resident |
Forest | Subtropical/Tropical Swamp | suitable | resident |
Savanna | Dry | suitable | resident |
Altitude | 0 - 1700 m | Occasional altitudinal limits |
Threat (level 1) | Threat (level 2) | Impact and Stresses | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Agriculture & aquaculture | Annual & perennial non-timber crops - Agro-industry farming | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Slow, Significant Declines | Low Impact: 5 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Agriculture & aquaculture | Livestock farming & ranching - Agro-industry grazing, ranching or farming | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Slow, Significant Declines | Low Impact: 5 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Biological resource use | Hunting & trapping terrestrial animals - Intentional use (species is the target) | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Slow, Significant Declines | Low Impact: 5 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Biological resource use | Logging & wood harvesting - Unintentional effects: (subsistence/small scale) [harvest] | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Slow, Significant Declines | Low Impact: 5 | ||||||
|
Purpose | Scale |
---|---|
Food - human | subsistence, national |
Handicrafts, jewellery, etc. | subsistence, national |
Medicine - human & veterinary | subsistence, national |
Pets/display animals, horticulture | international |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Species factsheet: Yellow-ridged Toucan Ramphastos culminatus. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/yellow-ridged-toucan-ramphastos-culminatus on 19/12/2024.
Recommended citation for factsheets for more than one species: BirdLife International (2024) IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/search on 19/12/2024.