NT
Writhed Hornbill Rhabdotorrhinus leucocephalus



Taxonomy

Taxonomic note
Rhabdotorrhinus leucocephalus (del Hoyo and Collar 2014) was previously placed in the genus Aceros.

Taxonomic source(s)
del Hoyo, J., Collar, N.J., Christie, D.A., Elliott, A. and Fishpool, L.D.C. 2014. HBW and BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World. Volume 1: Non-passerines. Lynx Edicions BirdLife International, Barcelona, Spain and Cambridge, UK.

IUCN Red List criteria met and history
Red List criteria met
Critically Endangered Endangered Vulnerable
- - -

Red List history
Year Category Criteria
2020 Near Threatened C1
2016 Near Threatened A2c+3c+4c;C1
2012 Near Threatened A2c+3c+4c;C1
2008 Near Threatened A2c; A3c; A4c; C1
2004 Near Threatened
2000 Lower Risk/Near Threatened
1996 Endangered
1994 Endangered
1988 Lower Risk/Least Concern
Species attributes

Migratory status not a migrant Forest dependency high
Land-mass type shelf island
Average mass -
Range

Estimate Data quality
Extent of Occurrence (breeding/resident) 168,000 km2 medium
Severely fragmented? no -
Population
Estimate Data quality Derivation Year of estimate
Population size unknown - - -
Population trend decreasing poor suspected 2001-2024
Rate of change over the past 10 years/3 generations (longer of the two periods) 8-15% - - -
Rate of change over the future 10 years/3 generations (longer of the two periods) 15-25% - - -
Rate of change over the past & future 10 years/3 generations (longer of the two periods) 15-25% - - -
Generation length 7.76 years - - -

Population justification: The population size of this species has not been quantified, but it has been described as rare in general. The species is also dependent on primary forest, which is undergoing moderately rapid forest loss within its small range. Hence, while the population has not been directly quantified, it is likely to be < 10,000 mature individuals.

Trend justification: Data on direct trends are lacking, but a moderately rapid population decline is likely to be taking place as a result of habitat loss, as well as pressure from hunting and trapping. Between 2001 and 2019, forest cover at >30% was lost at a rate of 8.1% (Global Forest Watch, 2020). This equates to a decline rate of 10% over three generations. Between 2016 and 2019, forest cover of >30% was lost at a rate of 2.7% (Global Forest Watch 2020). Projecting this rate of loss over three generations equates to a suspected future decline rate of 19% over three generations based on forest loss alone. In addition to forest loss, the species is also subject to pressure from hunting and trapping, hence the overall rate of decline is suspected to fall in the 15-25% band.


Country/territory distribution
Country/Territory Presence Origin Resident Breeding visitor Non-breeding visitor Passage migrant
Philippines extant native yes

Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBA)
Country/Territory IBA Name
Philippines Bislig
Philippines Camiguin island
Philippines Lake Lanao
Philippines Mount Agtuuganon and Mount Pasian
Philippines Mount Apo
Philippines Mount Balatukan
Philippines Mount Busa-Kiamba
Philippines Mount Daguma
Philippines Mount Diwata Range
Philippines Mount Hamiguitan (Tumadgo peak)
Philippines Mount Hilong-hilong
Philippines Mount Kaluayan - Mount Kinabalian Complex
Philippines Mount Kambinlio and Mount Redondo
Philippines Mount Kitanglad
Philippines Mount Latian complex
Philippines Mount Malindang
Philippines Mount Matutum
Philippines Mount Piagayungan
Philippines Mount Sinaka
Philippines Mount Sugarloaf
Philippines Mount Timolan
Philippines Pasonanca watershed

Habitats & altitude
Habitat (level 1) Habitat (level 2) Importance Occurrence
Forest Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland major resident
Altitude 300 - 1000 m Occasional altitudinal limits  

Threats & impact
Threat (level 1) Threat (level 2) Impact and Stresses
Agriculture & aquaculture Annual & perennial non-timber crops - Small-holder farming Timing Scope Severity Impact
Ongoing Majority (50-90%) Slow, Significant Declines Medium Impact: 6
Stresses
Ecosystem degradation, Ecosystem conversion
Agriculture & aquaculture Wood & pulp plantations - Small-holder plantations Timing Scope Severity Impact
Ongoing Majority (50-90%) Slow, Significant Declines Medium Impact: 6
Stresses
Ecosystem degradation, Ecosystem conversion
Biological resource use Hunting & trapping terrestrial animals - Intentional use (species is the target) Timing Scope Severity Impact
Ongoing Minority (<50%) Slow, Significant Declines Low Impact: 5
Stresses
Species mortality
Biological resource use Logging & wood harvesting - Unintentional effects: (large scale) [harvest] Timing Scope Severity Impact
Ongoing Minority (<50%) Slow, Significant Declines Low Impact: 5
Stresses
Ecosystem degradation

Utilisation
Purpose Scale
Food - human subsistence, national
Pets/display animals, horticulture subsistence, national

Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Species factsheet: Writhed Hornbill Rhabdotorrhinus leucocephalus. Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/writhed-hornbill-rhabdotorrhinus-leucocephalus on 22/11/2024.
Recommended citation for factsheets for more than one species: BirdLife International (2024) IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/search on 22/11/2024.