Taxonomic note
Poecile montanus has been split into Willow Tit P. montanus and Sichuan Tit P. weigoldicus following evidence of strong differentiation from molecular work (Tritsch et al. 2017), reinforcing the morphological differences noted by Eck and Martens (2006). All evidence points to the distinctiveness of P. weigoldicus and, with the proviso that the case will continue to be studied, the form is accepted as taking species rank.
Previously this treatment was not followed owing to the apparent overlap in morphological characters between weigoldicus and parapatric P. m. affinis, and because it was not possible to find adequate recordings to meaningfully analyse vocal differences. Hence P. weigoldicus was considered a subspecies of P. montanus (del Hoyo et al. 2016).
Taxonomic source(s)
Eck, S. and Martens, J. 2006. Systematic notes on Asian birds. 49. A preliminary review of the Aegithalidae, Remizidae and Paridae. Zoologische Mededelingen 80-5(1): 1-63.
Handbook of the Birds of the World and BirdLife International. 2019. Handbook of the Birds of the World and BirdLife International digital checklist of the birds of the world. Version 4. Available at: https://datazone.birdlife.org/userfiles/file/Species/Taxonomy/HBW-BirdLife_Checklist_v4_Dec19.zip.
Tritsch, C., Martens, J., Sun, Y. H., Heim, W., Strutzenberger, P., & Päckert, M. 2017. Improved sampling at the subspecies level solves a taxonomic dilemma–a case study of two enigmatic Chinese tit species (Aves, Passeriformes, Paridae, Poecile). Molecular phylogenetics and evolution 107: 538-550.
Critically Endangered | Endangered | Vulnerable |
---|---|---|
- | - | - |
Year | Category | Criteria |
---|---|---|
2019 | Least Concern | |
2016 | Not Recognised | |
2012 | Not Recognised | |
2008 | Not Recognised | |
2004 | Not Recognised | |
2000 | Not Recognised | |
1994 | Not Recognised | |
1988 | Not Recognised |
Migratory status | altitudinal migrant | Forest dependency | medium |
Land-mass type | Average mass | - |
Estimate | Data quality | |
---|---|---|
Extent of Occurrence (breeding/resident) | 33,800,000 km2 | |
Severely fragmented? | no | - |
Estimate | Data quality | Derivation | Year of estimate | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Population size | 175000000-253000000 mature individuals | poor | estimated | 2012 |
Population trend | decreasing | - | suspected | - |
Generation length | 4.6 years | - | - | - |
Population justification: In Europe, the breeding population is estimated to number 30.5-44.2 million pairs, which equates to 61-88.4 million mature individuals (BirdLife International 2015). Europe forms c.35% of the global range, so a very preliminary estimate of the global population size is 175-253 million mature individuals, although further validation of this estimate is needed. National population estimates include 10,000-110,000 breeding pairs in China, 100-100,000 breeding pairs in Japan and 10,000-100,000 breeding pairs in Russia (Brazil 2009).
Trend justification: Both increases and decreases in regional populations have been noted in the second half of the 20th century (del Hoyo et al. 2007). In Europe, trends since 1980 show that populations have undergone a moderate decline (EBCC 2018). Precautionarily the species is assessed as being in decline.
Country/Territory | Presence | Origin | Resident | Breeding visitor | Non-breeding visitor | Passage migrant |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Albania | extant | native | yes | |||
Austria | extant | native | yes | |||
Belarus | extant | native | yes | |||
Belgium | extant | native | yes | |||
Bosnia and Herzegovina | extant | native | yes | |||
Bulgaria | extant | native | yes | |||
China (mainland) | extant | native | yes | |||
Croatia | extant | native | yes | |||
Czechia | extant | native | yes | |||
Denmark | extant | native | yes | yes | ||
Estonia | extant | native | yes | |||
Finland | extant | native | yes | yes | ||
France | extant | native | yes | |||
Germany | extant | native | yes | |||
Greece | extant | native | yes | |||
Hungary | extant | native | yes | |||
Italy | extant | native | yes | |||
Japan | extant | native | yes | |||
Kazakhstan | extant | native | yes | |||
Kyrgyzstan | extant | native | yes | |||
Latvia | extant | native | yes | |||
Liechtenstein | extant | native | yes | |||
Lithuania | extant | native | yes | |||
Luxembourg | extant | native | yes | |||
Moldova | extant | native | yes | |||
Mongolia | extant | native | yes | |||
Montenegro | extant | native | yes | |||
Netherlands | extant | native | yes | |||
North Korea | extant | native | yes | |||
North Macedonia | extant | native | yes | |||
Norway | extant | native | yes | |||
Poland | extant | native | yes | |||
Romania | extant | native | yes | |||
Russia | extant | native | yes | yes | ||
Russia (Asian) | extant | native | yes | |||
Russia (Central Asian) | extant | native | yes | |||
Russia (European) | extant | native | yes | |||
Serbia | extant | native | yes | |||
Slovakia | extant | native | yes | |||
Slovenia | extant | native | yes | |||
South Korea | extant | uncertain | yes | |||
Spain | extant | uncertain | yes | |||
Sweden | extant | native | yes | |||
Switzerland | extant | native | yes | |||
Ukraine | extant | native | yes | |||
United Kingdom | extant | native | yes |
Country/Territory | IBA Name |
---|
Habitat (level 1) | Habitat (level 2) | Importance | Occurrence |
---|---|---|---|
Artificial/Terrestrial | Rural Gardens | suitable | resident |
Forest | Boreal | suitable | resident |
Forest | Temperate | suitable | resident |
Shrubland | Temperate | suitable | resident |
Wetlands (inland) | Bogs, Marshes, Swamps, Fens, Peatlands | suitable | resident |
Wetlands (inland) | Permanent Freshwater Lakes (over 8ha) | suitable | resident |
Wetlands (inland) | Permanent Rivers/Streams/Creeks (includes waterfalls) | suitable | resident |
Wetlands (inland) | Shrub Dominated Wetlands | suitable | resident |
Altitude | 0 - 4275 m | Occasional altitudinal limits |
Threat (level 1) | Threat (level 2) | Impact and Stresses | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Biological resource use | Logging & wood harvesting - Unintentional effects: (large scale) [harvest] | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Slow, Significant Declines | Low Impact: 5 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Climate change & severe weather | Other impacts | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Whole (>90%) | Unknown | Unknown | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Invasive and other problematic species, genes & diseases | Problematic native species/diseases - Dendrocopos major | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Negligible declines | Low Impact: 4 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Invasive and other problematic species, genes & diseases | Problematic native species/diseases - Named species | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Negligible declines | Low Impact: 4 | ||||||
|
Purpose | Scale |
---|---|
Pets/display animals, horticulture | subsistence, national |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Species factsheet: Willow Tit Poecile montanus. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/willow-tit-poecile-montanus on 22/11/2024.
Recommended citation for factsheets for more than one species: BirdLife International (2024) IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/search on 22/11/2024.