LC
White-faced Plover Charadrius dealbatus



Taxonomy

Taxonomic note

Charadrius alexandrinus, C. dealbatus and C. nivosus (del Hoyo and Collar 2014) were previously lumped as C. alexandrinus following Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993).

Taxonomic source(s)
del Hoyo, J., Collar, N.J., Christie, D.A., Elliott, A. and Fishpool, L.D.C. 2014. HBW and BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World. Volume 1: Non-passerines. Lynx Edicions BirdLife International, Barcelona, Spain and Cambridge, UK.
Kennerley, P. R.; Bakewell, D. N.; Round, P. D. 2008. Rediscovery of a long-lost Charadrius plover from South-East Asia. Forktail 24: 63-79.

IUCN Red List criteria met and history
Red List criteria met
Critically Endangered Endangered Vulnerable
- - -

Red List history
Year Category Criteria
2023 Least Concern
2016 Data Deficient
2014 Data Deficient
2012 Not Recognised
2008 Not Recognised
2004 Not Recognised
2000 Not Recognised
1994 Not Recognised
1988 Not Recognised
Species attributes

Migratory status full migrant Forest dependency does not normally occur in forest
Land-mass type Average mass 42 g
Range

Estimate Data quality
Extent of Occurrence (breeding/resident) 1,110,000 km2 medium
Extent of Occurrence (non-breeding) 4,730,000 km2 medium
Severely fragmented? no -
Population
Estimate Data quality Derivation Year of estimate
Population size 25000-250000 mature individuals poor suspected 2022
Population trend unknown - - -
Generation length 4.25 years - - -
Number of subpopulations 1 - - -
Percentage of mature individuals in largest subpopulation 100% - - -

Population justification: Estimating this species' population size was, and continues to be, hampered by difficulties in identification and its former conspecificity with C. alexandrinus. For example, the population size and trend estimates elucidated in Wetlands International (2017) do not separate the two taxa. Bamford et al. (2008) estimated the combined global population of C. alexandrinus alexandrinus and C. dealbatus to number 100,000 birds (then corrected to approximately 30,000 individuals of the present species) but admitted this to be little more than a 'best guess'. Using molecular techniques, Wang et al. (2019) measured the effective population size (Ne) to be much greater (150,000-520,000 individuals). However, through much of its range, and despite some pre-breeding congregations of more than 50 birds in some areas (eBird 2022), this species does appear relatively scarcer than other shorebird species. Overall, the population is therefore estimated at 25,000-250,000 mature individuals.

Trend justification: There are very few data regarding this species' trend. Precautionarily, the present assessment follows Bamford et al. (2008) in regarding it as unknown. eBird (2022) data from Kinmen County (a stronghold for the species between April and August) and Hainan show no trend in frequency, abundance or average count, although it is unclear how representative these areas are. However, other Charadrius in South-East Asia are declining due to disturbance, as well as the conversion and reclamation of habitat and it is plausible that, at least locally, these threats are causing losses in this species too.


Country/territory distribution
Country/Territory Presence Origin Resident Breeding visitor Non-breeding visitor Passage migrant
Cambodia extant native yes yes
China (mainland) extant native yes
Hong Kong (China) extant native yes
Indonesia extant native yes
Japan extant vagrant yes
Malaysia extant native yes
Myanmar extant native yes
Singapore extant native yes
Thailand extant native yes
Vietnam extant native yes yes

Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBA)
Country/Territory IBA Name

Habitats & altitude
Habitat (level 1) Habitat (level 2) Importance Occurrence
Artificial/Aquatic & Marine Artificial/Aquatic - Excavations (open) suitable non-breeding
Artificial/Aquatic & Marine Artificial/Aquatic - Ponds (below 8ha) suitable non-breeding
Artificial/Aquatic & Marine Artificial/Aquatic - Ponds (below 8ha) suitable breeding
Artificial/Aquatic & Marine Artificial/Aquatic - Salt Exploitation Sites suitable non-breeding
Artificial/Aquatic & Marine Artificial/Aquatic - Salt Exploitation Sites suitable breeding
Marine Coastal/Supratidal Coastal Brackish/Saline Lagoons/Marine Lakes suitable breeding
Marine Intertidal Mud Flats and Salt Flats suitable non-breeding
Marine Intertidal Sandy Shoreline and/or Beaches, Sand Bars, Spits, Etc major breeding
Marine Intertidal Shingle and/or Pebble Shoreline and/or Beaches suitable non-breeding
Marine Intertidal Shingle and/or Pebble Shoreline and/or Beaches suitable breeding
Marine Neritic Estuaries suitable non-breeding
Wetlands (inland) Seasonal/Intermittent Saline, Brackish or Alkaline Lakes and Flats suitable non-breeding
Altitude 0 - 50 m Occasional altitudinal limits  

Threats & impact
Threat (level 1) Threat (level 2) Impact and Stresses
Human intrusions & disturbance Recreational activities Timing Scope Severity Impact
Ongoing Minority (<50%) Unknown Unknown
Stresses
Species disturbance
Natural system modifications Dams & water management/use - Abstraction of surface water (unknown use) Timing Scope Severity Impact
Ongoing Minority (<50%) Unknown Unknown
Stresses
Ecosystem degradation
Natural system modifications Dams & water management/use - Dams (size unknown) Timing Scope Severity Impact
Ongoing Minority (<50%) Unknown Unknown
Stresses
Ecosystem degradation, Ecosystem conversion
Residential & commercial development Housing & urban areas Timing Scope Severity Impact
Ongoing Minority (<50%) Unknown Unknown
Stresses
Ecosystem degradation, Ecosystem conversion

Utilisation
Purpose Scale
Food - human subsistence, national
Pets/display animals, horticulture international
Sport hunting/specimen collecting subsistence, national

Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Species factsheet: White-faced Plover Charadrius dealbatus. Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/white-faced-plover-charadrius-dealbatus on 27/12/2024.
Recommended citation for factsheets for more than one species: BirdLife International (2024) IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/search on 27/12/2024.