Current view: Data table and detailed info
Taxonomic note
Previously (del Hoyo and Collar 2014) placed in the genus Alopecoenas and before that in the genus Gallicolumba but transferred to Pampusana on the grounds of the latter’s priority (Bruce et al. 2016). Alopecoenas beccarii and A. johannae (del Hoyo and Collar 2014) were previously placed in the genus Gallicolumba and lumped as G. beccarii following Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993). Hitherto considered conspecific with P. johannae, but here separated on account of rather greyer belly (with resultant dark brownish lower breastband) vs dark brownish below pale grey breast (2); dull dark green vs dull dark chestnut upperparts (3); (green-shot) grey of crown and neck-sides cutting to dull dark green on mantle, vs the (darker) grey of crown and neck-sides extending onto mantle (2); white eyering much narrower (ns2); purplish vs red legs (fide labels in NHMUK) (ns1). Affinities unclear: with P. johannae may be most closely related to P. canifrons, and these three appear to be related to the P. jobiensis complex; alternatively, may be related to P. sanctaecrucis and P. stairi, and more distantly to P. hoedtii and P. canifrons. Monotypic.
Taxonomic source(s)
Handbook of the Birds of the World and BirdLife International. 2022. Handbook of the Birds of the World and BirdLife International digital checklist of the birds of the world. Version 7. Available at: https://datazone.birdlife.org/userfiles/file/Species/Taxonomy/HBW-BirdLife_Checklist_v7_Dec22.zip.
IUCN Red List criteria met and history
Red List criteria met
Red List history
Migratory status |
not a migrant |
Forest dependency |
high |
Land-mass type |
|
Average mass |
- |
Population justification: The global population size has not been quantified, but the species is described as uncommon rather than rare (Gibbs et al. 2001). This species is considered to have a high dependency on forest habitat, and tree cover is estimated to have declined by 2.6% within its mapped range over the past three generations (Global Forest Watch 2022, using Hansen et al. [2013] data and methods disclosed therein). It is therefore tentatively suspected that this rate of cover loss may have led to a decline of between 1-19% in the species' population size over the same time frame, with a best estimate of reduction being less than 5%.
Trend justification: .
Country/territory distribution
Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBA)
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Species factsheet: Western Bronze Ground Dove Pampusana beccarii. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/western-bronze-ground-dove-pampusana-beccarii on 22/11/2024.
Recommended citation for factsheets for more than one species: BirdLife International (2024) IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/search on 22/11/2024.