LC
Waved Woodpecker Celeus undatus



Taxonomy

Taxonomic note
Waved Woodpecker Celeus undatus and Scaly-breasted Woodpecker C. grammicus have been lumped as Waved Woodpecker C. undatus, following the finding that there was no genetic or morphological differences between representatives of the two (Sampaio et al. 2018), and the previous observation that the calls were extremely similar (Benz and Robbins 2011).

Taxonomic source(s)
Handbook of the Birds of the World and BirdLife International. 2019. Handbook of the Birds of the World and BirdLife International digital checklist of the birds of the world. Version 4. Available at: https://datazone.birdlife.org/userfiles/file/Species/Taxonomy/HBW-BirdLife_Checklist_v4_Dec19.zip.
Sampaio, L., Aleixo, A., Schneider, H., Sampaio, I., Araripe, J., & RĂªgo, P. S. D. 2018. Molecular and plumage analyses indicate the incomplete separation of two woodpeckers (Aves, Picidae). Zoologica Scripta 47(4): 418-427.

IUCN Red List criteria met and history
Red List criteria met
Critically Endangered Endangered Vulnerable
- - -

Red List history
Year Category Criteria
2019 Least Concern
2016 Not Recognised
2012 Not Recognised
2008 Not Recognised
2004 Not Recognised
2000 Not Recognised
1994 Not Recognised
1988 Not Recognised
Species attributes

Migratory status not a migrant Forest dependency high
Land-mass type Average mass 64 g
Range

Estimate Data quality
Extent of Occurrence (breeding/resident) 6,950,000 km2 medium
Severely fragmented? no -
Population
Estimate Data quality Derivation Year of estimate
Population size unknown - - -
Population trend decreasing - suspected 2012-2027
Rate of change over the future 10 years/3 generations (longer of the two periods) 10-25% - - -
Rate of change over the past & future 10 years/3 generations (longer of the two periods) 10-25% - - -
Generation length 5 years - - -

Population justification: The global population size has not been quantified, but this species is described as 'uncommon' (Stotz et al. 1996). Poorly known and unobtrusive, this species also occurs in areas difficult to census (Winkler and Christie 2019).

Trend justification: Prior to the two species being lumped, those subspecies grouped under C. undatus were projected to lose 24.1-27.6%, and those under C. grammicus were projected to to lose 15.8-18.4% of suitable habitat within its distribution over three generations (15 years) based on a model of Amazonian deforestation (Soares-Filho et al. 2006, Bird et al. 2011). It was noted that the former group were relatively tolerant of habitat degradation hence was considered likely to decline by less than 25% over three generations. In combining the two former species the estimated rate from the previous models is overall lower than 25%, but there is a need to update the underlying data. For the present assessment the suspected current and future decline for Waved Woodpecker is <25% over three generations.


Country/territory distribution
Country/Territory Presence Origin Resident Breeding visitor Non-breeding visitor Passage migrant
Bolivia extant native yes
Brazil extant native yes
Colombia extant native yes
Ecuador extant native yes
French Guiana extant native yes
Guyana extant native yes
Peru extant native yes
Suriname extant native yes
Venezuela extant native yes

Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBA)
Country/Territory IBA Name

Habitats & altitude
Habitat (level 1) Habitat (level 2) Importance Occurrence
Forest Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland major resident
Forest Subtropical/Tropical Swamp suitable resident
Savanna Dry suitable resident
Wetlands (inland) Permanent Rivers/Streams/Creeks (includes waterfalls) suitable resident
Altitude 100 - 900 m Occasional altitudinal limits 500 - 1140 m

Threats & impact
Threat (level 1) Threat (level 2) Impact and Stresses
Agriculture & aquaculture Annual & perennial non-timber crops - Agro-industry farming Timing Scope Severity Impact
Ongoing Minority (<50%) Slow, Significant Declines Low Impact: 5
Stresses
Species disturbance, Ecosystem degradation, Ecosystem conversion
Agriculture & aquaculture Annual & perennial non-timber crops - Small-holder farming Timing Scope Severity Impact
Ongoing Minority (<50%) Negligible declines Low Impact: 4
Stresses
Species disturbance, Ecosystem degradation, Ecosystem conversion
Agriculture & aquaculture Livestock farming & ranching - Agro-industry grazing, ranching or farming Timing Scope Severity Impact
Ongoing Minority (<50%) Slow, Significant Declines Low Impact: 5
Stresses
Species disturbance, Ecosystem degradation, Ecosystem conversion
Agriculture & aquaculture Livestock farming & ranching - Small-holder grazing, ranching or farming Timing Scope Severity Impact
Ongoing Minority (<50%) Negligible declines Low Impact: 4
Stresses
Species disturbance, Ecosystem degradation, Ecosystem conversion

Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Species factsheet: Waved Woodpecker Celeus undatus. Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/waved-woodpecker-celeus-undatus on 22/11/2024.
Recommended citation for factsheets for more than one species: BirdLife International (2024) IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/search on 22/11/2024.