Current view: Data table and detailed info
Taxonomic note
Oriolus xanthonotus and O. consobrinus were previously lumped as O. xanthonotus (del Hoyo and Collar 2016) but were split based on based on phylogenomic, bioacoustic, biometric and morphological analyses (Rheindt et al. 2022). Two subspecies recognized.
Taxonomic source(s)
Handbook of the Birds of the World and BirdLife International. 2023. Handbook of the Birds of the World and BirdLife International digital checklist of the birds of the world. Version 8. Available at: https://datazone.birdlife.org/userfiles/file/Species/Taxonomy/HBW-BirdLife_Checklist_v8_Dec23.zip.
IUCN Red List criteria met and history
Red List criteria met
Red List history
Migratory status |
not a migrant |
Forest dependency |
medium |
Land-mass type |
|
Average mass |
- |
Population justification: Fundamentally unknown. Qualitative descriptions of abundance on Borneo range from 'common and widespread' (Mann 2008) to 'uncommon' (Eaton et al. 2021), but these interpretations include also Bornean populations of O. xanthonotus (the two having only recently been separated as distinct species: Rheindt et al. 2022). On Palawan, described as 'fairly common' (Allen 2020). Citizen science data suggest that on both islands it is relatively common in lowland forest blocks (eBird 2023); while it appears able to persist in mature Acacia mangium and Albizia plantations, albeit at lower densities than in forest (Styring et al. 2011), there is no evidence that it can persist in even mature oil palm plantations (Koh and Wilkove 2008, Styring et al. 2011). While the population is not thought to be small (there remains a large amount of suitable habitat), it is thought to have considerably decreased over the past 20-30 years in response to large-scale conversion of land to oil palm plantations.
Trend justification: Undoubtedly declining in response to conversion of forest habitats to plantations, although this species is tolerant of some degradation, and declines are not thought to have exceeded 20% over the past three generations, and are unlikely to accelerate in the near future. According to remote sensing data, forest cover loss in this species range over the past three generations was equivalent to 14-19%, depending on the assumptions used (Global Forest Watch 2023, based on data from Hansen et al. [2013] and methods disclosed therein). This species is considered moderately forest-dependent, with most records from lowland forest, where it evidently occurs at the highest densities (Styring et al. 2011, eBird 2023). While the species occurs in Acacia mangium and Albizia plantations (Styring et al. 2011), a large proportion of land conversion in its range has been conversion to oil palm plantations, which this species does not occur in (Koh and Wilkove 2008, Styring et al. 2011). While the remote sensing data used here is insensitive to forest degradation, this is not thought to be a key threat to this species, which regularly occurs in forest edge and mature second growth. Consequently, over the past three generations (10.8 years: 2012-2023) O. consobrinus is suspected to have declined by 10-20%. This same rate is precautionarily assumed to occur over the next three generations, although thereafter rates of reduction may begin to slow, as an increasing percentage of this species' range will lie in protected areas.
Country/territory distribution
Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBA)
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Species factsheet: Ventriloquial Oriole Oriolus consobrinus. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/ventriloquial-oriole-oriolus-consobrinus on 26/12/2024.
Recommended citation for factsheets for more than one species: BirdLife International (2024) IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/search on 26/12/2024.