Current view: Data table and detailed info
Taxonomic source(s)
del Hoyo, J., Collar, N.J., Christie, D.A., Elliott, A., Fishpool, L.D.C., Boesman, P. and Kirwan, G.M. 2016. HBW and BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World. Volume 2: Passerines. Lynx Edicions and BirdLife International, Barcelona, Spain and Cambridge, UK.
IUCN Red List criteria met and history
Red List criteria met
Red List history
Migratory status |
not a migrant |
Forest dependency |
high |
Land-mass type |
|
Average mass |
- |
Population justification: The species is seldom seen and is apparently uncommon (Pratt and Beehler 2015, Beehler and Pratt 2016). Six to ten individuals were seen in a 6.13 km walk through forest at 120-300 m (W. Goulding in litt. 2016). Assuming that this species could be detected up to about 20-25 m either side, this might equate to very approximately 20-46 individuals per km2 (W. Goulding in litt. 2020). The area of the the island is approximately 813 km2, but although there have been records from sea level (Mitchell 2017), the species has been mostly recorded in forest above an elevation of 120 m (W. Goulding in litt. 2020), which may give an area of habitat of 279 km2 (W. Goulding in litt. 2016). Based on an area of 279 - 813 km2 and the population densities above, the population size is estimated to be between 5,580 - 37,398 individuals, which roughly equates to 3,720 - 24,932 mature individuals, here rounded to 3,700 - 25,000. Since there have been few records below 120 m and the area of habitat is estimated to cover only around a third of the area of the island (W. Goulding in litt. 2016), the true value is likely to fall towards the lower end of this range, and is suspected to be around 5,000 (W. Goulding in litt. 2020).
The species has a small range on a single island and there is no indication that there is more than one subpopulation.
Trend justification: There is no population data from which to directly estimate trends. From 2009-2019, approximately 2% of forest with at least 50% canopy cover was lost across Tagula, but the rate of forest loss was lower at higher elevations (Global Forest Watch 2020), so the impact of forest loss on the species's population is expected to have been lower than this. The population size is tentatively suspected to be declining slowly. Over the past ten years, the population size is suspected to have undergone a small reduction of 1-5%.
In 2019, there were plans for commercial logging between Reuwo on the south coast and Rambuso Creek on the north coast (W. Goulding in litt. 2020). Should it go ahead, this could impact up to approximately a third of the species's habitat, but it is unlikely that the species would be completely eliminated from the area of logging. The impacts would be likely to begin within several years, with the full impact occurring ten or more years later (G. Dutson in litt. 2020). Over the next ten years, the population is suspected to undergo a reduction of 1-29%.
Country/territory distribution
Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBA)
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Species factsheet: Tagula White-eye Zosterops meeki. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/tagula-white-eye-zosterops-meeki on 24/12/2024.
Recommended citation for factsheets for more than one species: BirdLife International (2024) IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/search on 24/12/2024.