Current view: Data table and detailed info
Taxonomic source(s)
del Hoyo, J., Collar, N.J., Christie, D.A., Elliott, A., Fishpool, L.D.C., Boesman, P. and Kirwan, G.M. 2016. HBW and BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World. Volume 2: Passerines. Lynx Edicions and BirdLife International, Barcelona, Spain and Cambridge, UK.
IUCN Red List criteria met and history
Red List criteria met
Red List history
Migratory status |
not a migrant |
Forest dependency |
medium |
Land-mass type |
|
Average mass |
- |
Population justification: The abundance and habitat associations of this species have been subject to some confusion. It is widely considered uncommon or rare (White and Bruce 1986, del Hoyo et al. 2006, Eaton et al. 2021), and Jones et al. (1995) failed to detect it at all at their point count stations (n=556; although many of these were not positioned in suitable habitat/elevation). However, it has since been observed at no fewer than 13 distinct blocks of forest (eBird 2023) and can therefore be considered likely to occur widely in suitable habitat, albeit at a low density. In total, c.2,000 km2 of forest remains on Sumba (per Global Forest Watch 2023), but much of this is so heavily degraded that even a secondary forest-tolerant species such as this occurs in probably only a small percentage of this. Precautionarily, therefore, the species is suspected to number somewhere between 5,000 and 15,000 mature individuals, which assumes a somewhat arbitrary combined density/occupancy rate of 2.5-7.5 mature individuals/km2. This estimate is considered to be of poor data quality and in some respects highly precautionary—a more refined estimate (as called for nearly 30 years ago by Jones et al. 1995) should be a key research priority.
Trend justification: The only identified threat to this species is habitat loss and degradation. In the ten years to 2022, forest cover on Sumba declined by c.5% (Global Forest Watch 2023, based on data from Hansen et al. [2013] and methods disclosed therein). Although this species is tolerant of edge habitat and lightly degraded forest (Eaton et al. 2021) this is considered to be the minimum rate of population reduction. This is because (1) habitat loss appears has been greatest in the island's lowlands, where this species is commonest; and (2) habitat degradation is suspected to have nonetheless had some impact. Consequently, Muscicapa segregata is suspected of having declined by 5-10% between 2012 and 2022, and precautionarily the same rate is suspected to occur in the future.
Country/territory distribution
Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBA)
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Species factsheet: Sumba Brown Flycatcher Muscicapa segregata. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/sumba-brown-flycatcher-muscicapa-segregata on 22/12/2024.
Recommended citation for factsheets for more than one species: BirdLife International (2024) IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/search on 22/12/2024.