NT
Stilt Sandpiper Calidris himantopus



Taxonomy

Taxonomic source(s)
AERC TAC. 2003. AERC TAC Checklist of bird taxa occurring in Western Palearctic region, 15th Draft. Available at: http://www.aerc.eu/DOCS/Bird_taxa_of_the_WP15.xls.
Christidis, L. and Boles, W.E. 2008. Systematics and Taxonomy of Australian Birds. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Australia.
Cramp, S. and Simmons, K.E.L. (eds). 1977-1994. Handbook of the birds of Europe, the Middle East and Africa. The birds of the western Palearctic. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
del Hoyo, J., Collar, N.J., Christie, D.A., Elliott, A. and Fishpool, L.D.C. 2014. HBW and BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World. Volume 1: Non-passerines. Lynx Edicions BirdLife International, Barcelona, Spain and Cambridge, UK.
SACC. 2005 and updates. A classification of the bird species of South America. Available at: https://www.museum.lsu.edu/~Remsen/SACCBaseline.htm.

IUCN Red List criteria met and history
Red List criteria met
Critically Endangered Endangered Vulnerable
- A2bd+4bd A2bd+4bd

Red List history
Year Category Criteria
2024 Near Threatened A2b+4b
2016 Least Concern
2012 Least Concern
2009 Least Concern
2008 Least Concern
2004 Least Concern
2000 Lower Risk/Least Concern
1994 Lower Risk/Least Concern
1988 Lower Risk/Least Concern
Species attributes

Migratory status full migrant Forest dependency low
Land-mass type Average mass -
Range

Estimate Data quality
Extent of Occurrence (breeding/resident) 2,800,000 km2 medium
Extent of Occurrence (non-breeding) 32,000,000 km2 medium
Severely fragmented? no -
Population
Estimate Data quality Derivation Year of estimate
Population size 1200000 mature individuals good estimated 2023
Population trend decreasing - estimated 2014-2027
Rate of change over the past 10 years/3 generations (longer of the two periods) 0-59,20-29% - - -
Rate of change over the future 10 years/3 generations (longer of the two periods) 0-20% - - -
Rate of change over the past & future 10 years/3 generations (longer of the two periods) 0-59,20-25% - - -
Generation length 4.6 years - - -
Number of subpopulations 1 - - -
Percentage of mature individuals in largest subpopulation 100% - - -

Population justification: The population has been estimated at 1.2 million mature individuals (Andres et al. 2012, Bart et al. in prep.). This value is based on the Program for Regional and International Shorebird Monitoring (PRISM) surveys on the breeding grounds (Bart and Smith 2012, Smith et al. in prep.). The final estimate for Arctic Canada was 1,108,326 (Smith et al. in prep.), with an additional c.124,000 for surveyed parts of northern Alaska (Andres et al. 2012), totaling 1,232,326 and rounded to 1.2 million (Bart et al. in prep.). These surveys target breeding pairs in suitable breeding habitat, hence the values derived are considered to relate to mature individuals.

Trend justification: Previously, based on BBS/CBC data (Butcher and Niven 2007) the population trend was thought to be increasing in North America. However the majority of both the breeding and wintering range of the species are poorly covered by these surveys, and migration surveys are considered to cover a greater portion of the population and consequently generate more reliable trends. Smith et al. (2023) used updated migration count data to estimate a population reduction equivalent to 22.9% over three generations, though with wide confidence intervals between a reduction of 59.4% and an increase of 41%. The rate of reduction is here estimated to fall within the wide band of 0-59%, with the best estimate between 20-29% over three generations to cover the median rate of reduction estimated by Smith et al. (2023). This data is also used in the Avian Conservation Assessment Database December 2023 update (Partners in Flight 2023).
Breeding season data appeared to show moderate declines in the eastern part of the range, for example a reduction of greater than 70% at Churchill (Manitoba) between the 1960s and 1980s, but in contrast rapid increases in the western part of the range, for example at Prudhoe Bay (Alaska) a 300-400% increase occurred between the 1980s and 1990s (Klima and Jehl, Jr. 2020). However this increase at the western edge of the range likely reflects a westwards shift in the distribution as the species was virtually absent from Prudhoe Bay prior to the 1980s (Klima and Jehl, Jr. 2020). There are now data indicating declines in Alaska too, with surveys in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge recording 6,218 (SE 2,194) in 2002/2004 but only 4,324 (SE 1,469) in 2019/2022 (R. Lanctot in litt. 2024).


Country/territory distribution
Country/Territory Presence Origin Resident Breeding visitor Non-breeding visitor Passage migrant
Anguilla (to UK) extant native yes yes
Antigua and Barbuda extant native yes yes
Argentina extant native yes yes
Aruba (to Netherlands) extant native yes
Australia extant vagrant
Austria extant vagrant
Bahamas extant native yes yes
Barbados extant native yes yes
Belgium extant vagrant
Belize extant native yes yes
Bermuda (to UK) extant native yes
Bolivia extant native yes yes
Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba (to Netherlands) extant native yes
Brazil extant native yes yes
Canada extant native yes yes
Cayman Islands (to UK) extant native yes yes
Chile extant native yes yes
Colombia extant native yes yes
Costa Rica extant native yes yes
Cuba extant native yes yes
CuraƧao (to Netherlands) extant native yes
Denmark extant vagrant
Dominica extant native yes yes
Dominican Republic extant native yes yes
Ecuador extant native yes yes
El Salvador extant native yes yes
Finland extant vagrant
France extant vagrant
French Guiana extant native yes yes
Grenada extant native yes yes
Guadeloupe (to France) extant native yes yes
Guatemala extant native yes yes
Guyana extant native yes yes
Haiti extant native yes yes
Honduras extant native yes yes
Iceland extant vagrant
Ireland extant vagrant
Jamaica extant native yes yes
Japan extant vagrant
Martinique (to France) extant native yes yes
Mexico extant native yes yes
Montserrat (to UK) extant native yes yes
Morocco extant vagrant
Nicaragua extant native yes yes
Norway extant vagrant
Panama extant native yes yes
Paraguay extant native yes yes
Peru extant native yes yes
Puerto Rico (to USA) extant native yes yes
Sint Maarten (to Netherlands) extant native yes yes
Spain extant vagrant
St Barthelemy (to France) extant native yes yes
St Kitts and Nevis extant native yes yes
St Lucia extant native yes yes
St Martin (to France) extant native yes yes
St Pierre and Miquelon (to France) extant native yes
St Vincent and the Grenadines extant native yes yes
Suriname extant native yes yes
Sweden extant vagrant
Taiwan, China extant vagrant
Trinidad and Tobago extant native yes yes
Turks and Caicos Islands (to UK) extant native yes yes
United Kingdom extant vagrant
Uruguay extant native yes yes
USA extant native yes yes yes
Venezuela extant native yes yes
Virgin Islands (to UK) extant native yes yes
Virgin Islands (to USA) extant native yes yes

Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBA)
Country/Territory IBA Name
Canada Landis Lake
Canada Quill Lakes
Puerto Rico (to USA) Suroeste

Habitats & altitude
Habitat (level 1) Habitat (level 2) Importance Occurrence
Artificial/Aquatic & Marine Artificial/Aquatic - Wastewater Treatment Areas suitable non-breeding
Forest Boreal suitable breeding
Grassland Subtropical/Tropical Seasonally Wet/Flooded suitable non-breeding
Grassland Tundra major breeding
Wetlands (inland) Bogs, Marshes, Swamps, Fens, Peatlands suitable non-breeding
Wetlands (inland) Permanent Freshwater Marshes/Pools (under 8ha) suitable non-breeding
Wetlands (inland) Permanent Saline, Brackish or Alkaline Lakes suitable non-breeding
Wetlands (inland) Tundra Wetlands (incl. pools and temporary waters from snowmelt) major breeding
Altitude 0 - 4200 m Occasional altitudinal limits  

Threats & impact
Threat (level 1) Threat (level 2) Impact and Stresses
Agriculture & aquaculture Annual & perennial non-timber crops - Agro-industry farming Timing Scope Severity Impact
Ongoing Minority (<50%) Slow, Significant Declines Low Impact: 5
Stresses
Ecosystem degradation, Ecosystem conversion
Biological resource use Hunting & trapping terrestrial animals - Intentional use (species is the target) Timing Scope Severity Impact
Ongoing Minority (<50%) Negligible declines Low Impact: 4
Stresses
Species disturbance, Species mortality
Climate change & severe weather Habitat shifting & alteration Timing Scope Severity Impact
Ongoing Minority (<50%) Unknown Unknown
Stresses
Indirect ecosystem effects, Ecosystem degradation
Invasive and other problematic species, genes & diseases Problematic native species/diseases - Vulpes vulpes Timing Scope Severity Impact
Ongoing Minority (<50%) Causing/Could cause fluctuations Low Impact: 5
Stresses
Reduced reproductive success, Species mortality

Utilisation
Purpose Scale
Food - human subsistence, national
Pets/display animals, horticulture international

Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Species factsheet: Stilt Sandpiper Calidris himantopus. Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/stilt-sandpiper-calidris-himantopus on 22/12/2024.
Recommended citation for factsheets for more than one species: BirdLife International (2024) IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/search on 22/12/2024.