Current view: Data table and detailed info
Taxonomic source(s)
del Hoyo, J., Collar, N.J., Christie, D.A., Elliott, A. and Fishpool, L.D.C. 2014. HBW and BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World. Volume 1: Non-passerines. Lynx Edicions BirdLife International, Barcelona, Spain and Cambridge, UK.
IUCN Red List criteria met and history
Red List criteria met
Red List history
Migratory status |
not a migrant |
Forest dependency |
medium |
Land-mass type |
|
Average mass |
- |
Population justification: The global population size has not been quantified, but the species is described as fairly common in forest, edge and occasionally plantations (Eaton et al. 2021).
Trend justification: Habitat loss is considered the only plausible threat to this species and there is no evidence of hunting (M. Iqbal in litt. 2023). Remote sensing data indicate minimal (<3%) forest cover loss in its range during 2012-2022 (Global Forest Watch 2023, based on data from Hansen et al. [2013] and methods disclosed therein). Moreover, it is reportedly tolerant of habitat degradation, and occurs occasionally in plantations (Eaton et al. 2021). In the absence of evidence for other significant threats, the population is therefore suspected to be stable.
Country/territory distribution
Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBA)
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Species factsheet: Simeulue Scops-owl Otus umbra. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/simeulue-scops-owl-otus-umbra on 24/12/2024.
Recommended citation for factsheets for more than one species: BirdLife International (2024) IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/search on 24/12/2024.