Current view: Data table and detailed info
Taxonomic source(s)
del Hoyo, J., Collar, N.J., Christie, D.A., Elliott, A., Fishpool, L.D.C., Boesman, P. and Kirwan, G.M. 2016. HBW and BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World. Volume 2: Passerines. Lynx Edicions and BirdLife International, Barcelona, Spain and Cambridge, UK.
IUCN Red List criteria met and history
Red List criteria met
Red List history
Migratory status |
not a migrant |
Forest dependency |
high |
Land-mass type |
continent
|
Average mass |
11 g |
Population justification: The global population size has not been quantified; however, it has been described as a very rare and very local resident in Nepal (Inskipp et al. 2016), frequently recorded in Bhutan (Collar and Robson 2020), and locally common in India (Collar and Robson 2020), very commonly found in Pange and Talley valley (Singh 1994). eBird records suggest the species is locally common in Sikkim, areas of Bhutan and in western Arunachal Pradesh (eBird 2024). It is also suggested that the species is more widespread and abundant than current records imply.
Trend justification:
Remote sensing data indicate that ongoing rates of forest loss are minimal: over the past ten years (2013-2023) Sikkim has undergone a decline of 0.41% in tree cover, Bhutan has experienced a decline of 0.55%, Arunachal Pradesh a 2.3% decrease and Nepal a 0.37% decrease (Global Forest Watch 2024, based on data from Hansen et al. (2013) and methods therein). Deforestation pressures, primarily occurring at lower elevations for development and agriculture, are less likely to significantly impact the species, which generally inhabits higher elevations.
Despite protective measures, there are some threats to habitat, such as illegal logging, which has been described as a major driver of deforestation in Arunachal Pradesh (Sheth
et al. 2020). Additionally, rural communities in Sikkim heavily rely on forests for the collection of Non-Timber Forest Products (NTFP), fuelwood extraction, and other purposes (Kanade and John 2018). However, these threats are not currently considered significant enough to pose a major risk to the species. Areas within the 300-2,500 m range, known as the agro-ecological zone, experienced significant conversion for agriculture, including the cultivation of Large Cardamon (
Amomum subulatum) which notably expanded in the 1980s and 1990s. However, since 2000, the conversion rate has decreased, leading to abandoned plantations at different stages of successional forest (Kanade and John 2018). This indicates a possibility for localised recovery of areas that were converted for agriculture within the species range.
Precautionarily the species is suspected to be declining at a slow rate, placed here in the band 0-5% in ten years: the lower estimate considers the species' relatively high elevational range and low rates of forest cover loss, while the upper limit opts for a more cautious approach.
Country/territory distribution
Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBA)
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Species factsheet: Rufous-throated Wren-babbler Spelaeornis caudatus. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/rufous-throated-wren-babbler-spelaeornis-caudatus on 22/12/2024.
Recommended citation for factsheets for more than one species: BirdLife International (2024) IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/search on 22/12/2024.