Taxonomic note
Previously listed as Trichixos pyrropygus (del Hoyo and Collar 2016) but moved to Copsychus on the basis of unpublished genetic data (Per Alström, in litt. via WGAC) that support a broad Copsychus. Genus name is masculine, species name is adjective, so, despite original spelling, species name must be corrected to masculine form. Monotypic.
Taxonomic source(s)
Handbook of the Birds of the World and BirdLife International. 2022. Handbook of the Birds of the World and BirdLife International digital checklist of the birds of the world. Version 7. Available at: https://datazone.birdlife.org/userfiles/file/Species/Taxonomy/HBW-BirdLife_Checklist_v7_Dec22.zip.
Critically Endangered | Endangered | Vulnerable |
---|---|---|
- | - | - |
Year | Category | Criteria |
---|---|---|
2022 | Near Threatened | A2cd+3cd+4cd |
2016 | Near Threatened | A2c+3c+4c |
2012 | Near Threatened | A2c+3c+4c |
2008 | Near Threatened | A2c; A3c; A4c |
2004 | Near Threatened | |
2000 | Lower Risk/Near Threatened | |
1994 | Lower Risk/Least Concern | |
1988 | Lower Risk/Least Concern |
Migratory status | not a migrant | Forest dependency | high |
Land-mass type |
continent shelf island |
Average mass | 41 g |
Estimate | Data quality | |
---|---|---|
Extent of Occurrence (breeding/resident) | 2,820,000 km2 | medium |
Severely fragmented? | no | - |
Estimate | Data quality | Derivation | Year of estimate | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Population size | unknown | - | - | - |
Population trend | decreasing | poor | suspected | 2016-2026 |
Rate of change over the past 10 years/3 generations (longer of the two periods) | 20-29% | - | - | - |
Rate of change over the future 10 years/3 generations (longer of the two periods) | 20-29% | - | - | - |
Rate of change over the past & future 10 years/3 generations (longer of the two periods) | 20-29% | - | - | - |
Generation length | 3.4 years | - | - | - |
Number of subpopulations | 3-100 | - | - | - |
Percentage of mature individuals in largest subpopulation | 1-89% | - | - | - |
Population justification: The population size of this species has not been quantified. However, it is typically described as scarce to uncommon (Wells 2007, Mann 2008, Eaton et al. 2016) and in Sarawak, Borneo, a density of 10 birds/km2 was recorded (Fogden 1976). Consequently, although the population size has not been estimated, it is not considered likely to meet or approach the threshold for assessment as Threatened (<10,000 mature individuals).
Trend justification: Suspected to be declining because of forest loss throughout its range. Over the past 10 years, forest loss in this species' range has been equivalent to 18–20% (Global Forest Watch 2022, using data from Hansen et al. [2013] and methods disclosed therein). Because this rate was similar between 2016 and 2020, with little indication this will slow in the future, the same rate is projected over the next three generations. As a forest-dependent species, the population is suspected to be declining at a rate broadly similar to the that of forest loss, although it can tolerate some degradation. In addition, this species is prized for the bird trade. Symes et al. (2018) assigned probability curves according to expert opinion on trade desirability in conjunction with accessibility (based on a distance to forest edge from remote sensed forest data) to determine likely rates of population loss over the next three generation or ten-year period: across the species' range, the estimated loss was 27% because of hunting alone, although this analysis had no term to account for reproduction, used a slightly longer three-generation time period (11.4 years) than that used here, and analysed only Indonesia where trapping pressure is at its highest; consequently, this figure may be overly pessimistic. Combining these data, the species is suspected of declining at an ongoing rate of 20-29%.
Country/Territory | Presence | Origin | Resident | Breeding visitor | Non-breeding visitor | Passage migrant |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brunei | extant | native | yes | |||
Indonesia | extant | native | yes | |||
Malaysia | extant | native | yes | |||
Thailand | extant | native | yes |
Country/Territory | IBA Name |
---|---|
Malaysia | Belum-Temenggor |
Malaysia | Bintang Range |
Malaysia | Danum Valley Conservation Area |
Malaysia | Endau-Rompin |
Malaysia | Gunung Pueh |
Malaysia | Kabili-Sepilok |
Malaysia | Kinabatangan floodplain |
Malaysia | Krau Wildlife Reserve |
Malaysia | Lambir Hills National Park |
Malaysia | Lanjak Entimau Wildlife Sanctuary |
Malaysia | Maliau Basin Conservation Area |
Malaysia | Mulu - Buda Protected Area |
Malaysia | Nakawan Range |
Malaysia | Niah National Park |
Malaysia | Panti forest |
Malaysia | Pondok Tanjung Forest Reserve |
Malaysia | Selangor Heritage Park |
Malaysia | Similajau National Park |
Malaysia | South-east Pahang peat swamp forest |
Malaysia | Tabin Wildlife Reserve |
Malaysia | Taman Negara National Park |
Malaysia | Tanjung Datu-Samunsam Protected Area |
Malaysia | Tawau Hills Park |
Thailand | Bala Sector, Hala-Bala Wildlife Sanctuary |
Thailand | Hala Sector, Hala-Bala Wildlife Sanctuary and Bang Lang National Park |
Habitat (level 1) | Habitat (level 2) | Importance | Occurrence |
---|---|---|---|
Artificial/Terrestrial | Plantations | marginal | resident |
Forest | Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland | major | resident |
Altitude | 0 - 900 m | Occasional altitudinal limits | (max) 1200 m |
Threat (level 1) | Threat (level 2) | Impact and Stresses | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Agriculture & aquaculture | Annual & perennial non-timber crops - Agro-industry farming | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Majority (50-90%) | Slow, Significant Declines | Medium Impact: 6 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Agriculture & aquaculture | Annual & perennial non-timber crops - Small-holder farming | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Slow, Significant Declines | Low Impact: 5 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Biological resource use | Hunting & trapping terrestrial animals - Intentional use (species is the target) | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Majority (50-90%) | Slow, Significant Declines | Medium Impact: 6 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Biological resource use | Logging & wood harvesting - Unintentional effects: (large scale) [harvest] | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Majority (50-90%) | Slow, Significant Declines | Medium Impact: 6 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Biological resource use | Logging & wood harvesting - Unintentional effects: (subsistence/small scale) [harvest] | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Slow, Significant Declines | Low Impact: 5 | ||||||
|
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Species factsheet: Rufous-tailed Shama Copsychus pyrropygus. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/rufous-tailed-shama-copsychus-pyrropygus on 22/11/2024.
Recommended citation for factsheets for more than one species: BirdLife International (2024) IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/search on 22/11/2024.