Current view: Data table and detailed info
Taxonomic note
Previously listed as Turdinus calcicola (del Hoyo and Collar 2016) but Cai et al. (2019) found it more closely related to Malacocincla and revived the genus Gypsophila for this and allied species. Formerly treated as conspecific with G. crispifrons following Sibley & Monroe (1990, 1993), but differs in its tawny central belly with white shaft streaks vs grey belly with white-and-dark-brown streaks (3); smaller, more organized black arrowheads on white throat (1); paler upperparts, wings and flanks (1); shorter wing (mean of 3 males 73.7 mm vs 15 male nominate 78.6; mean of 2 females 69 vs 15 female nominate 77.5; at least 1); song a short (0.7–1.5 s) phrase of 3–6 notes vs a much more protracted (4–30 s) phrase of at least 16 notes, commonly many more (at least 2) (Boesman 2016). Monotypic.
Taxonomic source(s)
Handbook of the Birds of the World and BirdLife International. 2021. Handbook of the Birds of the World and BirdLife International digital checklist of the birds of the world. Version 6. Available at: https://datazone.birdlife.org/userfiles/file/Species/Taxonomy/HBW-BirdLife_Checklist_v6_Dec21.zip.
IUCN Red List criteria met and history
Red List criteria met
Red List history
Migratory status |
not a migrant |
Forest dependency |
high |
Land-mass type |
|
Average mass |
- |
Population justification: The population density of this species has not been directly estimated, however based on an assessment of known records and inferred densities (eBird 2022) and expert consultation (P. Round in litt. 2021), its density is believed to be no higher than that that of P. capistratum, which has been recorded occurring at c.23 mature individuals/km2 (Francis & Wells 2003), and may be substantially lower (P. Round in litt. 2021). Round et al. (2021) identified only 174 km2 of suitable habitat. Applying this density gives a total of 4,000 mature individuals. Accounting for uncertainties, the population is therefore estimated to number 2,500-6,000 mature individuals, with a best estimate of 2,500-4,000.
Trend justification: This species is inferred to be undergoing a slow, continuous decline because of quarrying for limestone in parts of its very limited range, a threat that has caused localised extinctions and is projected to do so in the future, with only 1.4% of the species' range formally protected in a national park (Round et al. 2021).
Country/territory distribution
Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBA)
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Species factsheet: Rufous Limestone-babbler Gypsophila calcicola. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/rufous-limestone-babbler-gypsophila-calcicola on 22/12/2024.
Recommended citation for factsheets for more than one species: BirdLife International (2024) IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/search on 22/12/2024.