• Summary
• Text account
• Data table and detailed info
• Distribution map
• Reference and further resources

Taxonomic source(s)
del Hoyo, J., Collar, N.J., Christie, D.A., Elliott, A. and Fishpool, L.D.C. 2014. HBW and BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World. Lynx Edicions BirdLife International, Barcelona, Spain and Cambridge, UK.
del Hoyo, J.; Collar, N. J.; Christie, D. A.; Elliott, A.; Fishpool, L. D. C. 2014. HBW and BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World. Barcelona, Spain and Cambridge UK: Lynx Edicions and BirdLife International.
SACC. 2006. A classification of the bird species of South America. Available at: https://www.museum.lsu.edu/~Remsen/SACCBaseline.htm.
SACC. 2006. A classification of the bird species of South America. Available at: https://www.museum.lsu.edu/~Remsen/SACCBaseline.htm.

Red List criteria met

Critically Endangered	Endangered	Vulnerable
-	-	-

Red List history

Year	Category	Criteria
2016	Near Threatened	A3cd
2014	Near Threatened	A3cd
2012	Near Threatened	A2cd
2008	Near Threatened	A2c,d
2006	Near Threatened
2004	Near Threatened
2000	Lower Risk/Near Threatened
1996	Vulnerable
1994	Vulnerable
1988	Threatened

Migratory status	full migrant	Forest dependency	does not normally occur in forest
Land-mass type	continent	Average mass	-

	Estimate	Data quality
Extent of Occurrence (breeding/resident)	604,000 km2	medium
Extent of Occurrence (non-breeding)	886,000 km2	medium
Severely fragmented?	no	-

	Estimate	Data quality	Derivation	Year of estimate
Population size	unknown	good	estimated	2010
Population trend	stable	poor	estimated	1960-2008
Rate of change over the future 10 years/3 generations (longer of the two periods)	25-29%	-	-	-
Generation length	16 years	-	-	-
Percentage of mature individuals in largest subpopulation	100%	-	-	-

Population justification: The population is estimated to number 106,000 individuals based on coordinated census in 2010 (Marconi et al. 2011).

Trend justification: Trends since the 1990s have been positive, indicating the start of a recovery, and census data suggest that the population may have stabilised (Marconi et al. 2011). Despite this, it is suspected that the population will undergo a moderately rapid decline over the next three generations owing mainly to habitat loss and degradation.

Country/Territory	Presence	Origin	Resident	Breeding visitor	Non-breeding visitor	Passage migrant
Argentina	extant	native	yes
Bolivia	extant	native	yes
Chile	extant	native	yes
Peru	extant	native	yes

Country/Territory	IBA Name
Argentina	Laguna Grande
Argentina	Laguna Guayatayoc
Argentina	Laguna Purulla
Argentina	Lagunas Runtuyoc - Los Enamorados
Argentina	Monumento Natural Laguna de Los Pozuelos
Argentina	Reserva de Uso Múltiple Bañados del Río Dulce y Laguna Mar Chiquita
Argentina	Reserva Provincial Laguna Brava
Argentina	Salar del Hombre Muerto
Argentina	Sistema de Lagunas Los Aparejos, Azul y Negra
Argentina	Sistema de lagunas de Vilama-Pululos
Bolivia	Lago Poopó y Río Laka Jahuira
Bolivia	Lagunas de Agua Dulce del Sureste de Potosí
Bolivia	Lagunas Salinas del Suroeste de Potosí
Bolivia	Parque Nacional Sajama
Bolivia	Reserva Biológica Cordillera de Sama
Chile	Laguna del Negro Francisco y Laguna Santa Rosa
Chile	Monumento Natural Salar de Surire
Chile	Parque Nacional Salar de Huasco
Chile	Parque Nacional Volcán Isluga
Chile	Reserva Nacional Los Flamencos - Soncor
Chile	Salar de Piedra Parada
Chile	Salar de Pujsa
Chile	Salar de Tara
Peru	Covire
Peru	Lago Parinacochas

Habitat (level 1)	Habitat (level 2)	Importance	Occurrence
Artificial/Aquatic & Marine	Artificial/Aquatic - Salt Exploitation Sites	major	breeding
Artificial/Aquatic & Marine	Artificial/Aquatic - Salt Exploitation Sites	major	non-breeding
Wetlands (inland)	Permanent Saline, Brackish or Alkaline Lakes	major	breeding
Wetlands (inland)	Permanent Saline, Brackish or Alkaline Lakes	major	non-breeding
Altitude	3500 - 4700 m	Occasional altitudinal limits	(min) 2300 m

Threat (level 1)	Threat (level 2)	Impact and Stresses
Biological resource use	Hunting & trapping terrestrial animals - Intentional use (species is the target)	Timing		Scope		Severity		Impact
		Future		Whole (>90%)		Rapid Declines		Medium Impact: 7
		Stresses Species mortality
Climate change & severe weather	Other impacts	Timing		Scope		Severity		Impact
		Ongoing		Majority (50-90%)		Slow, Significant Declines		Medium Impact: 6
		Stresses Indirect ecosystem effects
Energy production & mining	Mining & quarrying	Timing		Scope		Severity		Impact
		Ongoing		Majority (50-90%)		Slow, Significant Declines		Medium Impact: 6
		Stresses Ecosystem degradation, Ecosystem conversion
Human intrusions & disturbance	Recreational activities	Timing		Scope		Severity		Impact
		Ongoing		Majority (50-90%)		Slow, Significant Declines		Medium Impact: 6
		Stresses Species disturbance

Purpose	Scale
Food - human	subsistence, national
Pets/display animals, horticulture	international

---

Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Species factsheet: Puna Flamingo Phoenicoparrus jamesi. Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/puna-flamingo-phoenicoparrus-jamesi on 24/11/2024.
Recommended citation for factsheets for more than one species: BirdLife International (2024) IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/search on 24/11/2024.