• Summary
• Text account
• Data table and detailed info
• Distribution map
• Reference and further resources

Taxonomic source(s)
del Hoyo, J., Collar, N.J., Christie, D.A., Elliott, A., Fishpool, L.D.C., Boesman, P. and Kirwan, G.M. 2016. HBW and BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World. Volume 2: Passerines. Lynx Edicions and BirdLife International, Barcelona, Spain and Cambridge, UK.

Red List criteria met

Critically Endangered	Endangered	Vulnerable
-	-	-

Red List history

Year	Category	Criteria
2023	Near Threatened	A2c+3c+4c
2016	Near Threatened	A2c+3c+4c
2012	Near Threatened	A2c+3c+4c
2008	Near Threatened	A2c; A3c; A4c
2004	Near Threatened
2000	Lower Risk/Near Threatened
1994	Lower Risk/Near Threatened
1988	Near Threatened

Migratory status	not a migrant	Forest dependency	medium
Land-mass type		Average mass	-

	Estimate	Data quality
Extent of Occurrence (breeding/resident)	448,000 km2	medium
Severely fragmented?	no	-

	Estimate	Data quality	Derivation	Year of estimate
Population size	unknown	-	-	-
Population trend	decreasing	poor	inferred	2015-2028
Rate of change over the past 10 years/3 generations (longer of the two periods)	15-25%	-	-	-
Rate of change over the future 10 years/3 generations (longer of the two periods)	15-25%	-	-	-
Rate of change over the past & future 10 years/3 generations (longer of the two periods)	15-25%	-	-	-
Generation length	4.2 years	-	-	-

Population justification: The global population size of this species has not been quantified, but c.75,000 km² of forest remains in its range (per Global Forest Watch 2022). Even accounting for descriptions of its abundance as local or rare (del Hoyo et al. 2005, Eaton et al. 2021), the population size is therefore unlikely to be especially small, even if only a portion of forest in its range is occupied.

Trend justification: This species is dependent on lowland, good-quality forest (Eaton et al. 2021, J. Eaton in litt. 2022). In the three generations (12.6 years; Bird et al. 2020) to 2021, forest extent (of >50% cover) was reduced in this species' range by 14-16% (Global Forest Watch 2022, based on data from Hansen et al. [2013] and methods disclosed therein). These data do not account for habitat degradation, nor for the fact that this species most likely occurs at higher densities at the lowest elevations of good forest. Consequently, the rate of forest cover loss is thought to represent the minimum possible rate of population reduction. In the past three generations, it is therefore suspected of having declined by 15-25%. There is little indication this rate will slow in the future, with rates of forest cover loss between 2016 and 2021 showing a moderate acceleration, and projections by Voigt et al. (2021) indicating that forests favoured by this species are most at risk. The same rate of population reduction is therefore suspected to occur over the next three generations.

Country/Territory	Presence	Origin	Resident	Breeding visitor	Non-breeding visitor	Passage migrant
Indonesia	extant	native	yes

Country/Territory	IBA Name
Indonesia	Bogani Nani Wartabone
Indonesia	Buton Utara
Indonesia	Feruhumpenai - Matano
Indonesia	Gunung Sahendaruman
Indonesia	Kepulauan Togean
Indonesia	Lambusango
Indonesia	Likupang
Indonesia	Mahawu - Masarang
Indonesia	Mekongga
Indonesia	Rawa Aopa Watumohai
Indonesia	Tangkoko Dua Sudara

Habitat (level 1)	Habitat (level 2)	Importance	Occurrence
Artificial/Terrestrial	Subtropical/Tropical Heavily Degraded Former Forest	suitable	resident
Forest	Subtropical/Tropical Mangrove Vegetation Above High Tide Level	suitable	resident
Forest	Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland	major	resident
Shrubland	Subtropical/Tropical Moist	suitable	resident
Altitude	0 - 700 m	Occasional altitudinal limits	(max) 900 m

Threat (level 1)	Threat (level 2)	Impact and Stresses
Agriculture & aquaculture	Annual & perennial non-timber crops - Shifting agriculture	Timing		Scope		Severity		Impact
		Ongoing		Minority (<50%)		Slow, Significant Declines		Low Impact: 5
		Stresses Ecosystem degradation, Ecosystem conversion
Agriculture & aquaculture	Wood & pulp plantations - Small-holder plantations	Timing		Scope		Severity		Impact
		Ongoing		Minority (<50%)		Slow, Significant Declines		Low Impact: 5
		Stresses Ecosystem degradation, Ecosystem conversion
Biological resource use	Logging & wood harvesting - Unintentional effects: (large scale) [harvest]	Timing		Scope		Severity		Impact
		Ongoing		Majority (50-90%)		Slow, Significant Declines		Medium Impact: 6
		Stresses Ecosystem degradation, Ecosystem conversion
Biological resource use	Logging & wood harvesting - Unintentional effects: (subsistence/small scale) [harvest]	Timing		Scope		Severity		Impact
		Ongoing		Majority (50-90%)		Slow, Significant Declines		Medium Impact: 6
		Stresses Ecosystem degradation, Ecosystem conversion

---

Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Species factsheet: Pied Cuckooshrike Coracina bicolor. Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/pied-cuckooshrike-coracina-bicolor on 22/11/2024.
Recommended citation for factsheets for more than one species: BirdLife International (2024) IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/search on 22/11/2024.