Taxonomic note
Hemiphaga novaeseelandiae and H. chathamensis (del Hoyo and Collar 2014) were previously lumped as H. novaeseelandiae following Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993).
Taxonomic source(s)
del Hoyo, J., Collar, N.J., Christie, D.A., Elliott, A. and Fishpool, L.D.C. 2014. HBW and BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World. Volume 1: Non-passerines. Lynx Edicions BirdLife International, Barcelona, Spain and Cambridge, UK.
Critically Endangered | Endangered | Vulnerable |
---|---|---|
- | - | - |
Year | Category | Criteria |
---|---|---|
2022 | Least Concern | |
2016 | Near Threatened | A2cde+3cde+4cde |
2014 | Near Threatened | A2cde+3cde+4cde |
2012 | Not Recognised | |
2008 | Not Recognised | |
2004 | Not Recognised | |
2000 | Not Recognised | |
1994 | Not Recognised | |
1988 | Not Recognised |
Migratory status | not a migrant | Forest dependency | medium |
Land-mass type | Average mass | 653 g |
Estimate | Data quality | |
---|---|---|
Extent of Occurrence (breeding/resident) | 669,000 km2 | medium |
Severely fragmented? | no | - |
Estimate | Data quality | Derivation | Year of estimate | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Population size | unknown | - | - | - |
Population trend | increasing | poor | suspected | - |
Generation length | 7.2 years | - | - | - |
Number of subpopulations | 1 | - | - | - |
Percentage of mature individuals in largest subpopulation | 100% | - | - | - |
Population justification: The global population of this species has not been quantified but is described generally as common to uncommon and is predictably most abundant where intensive predator controls have taken place (Baber et al. 2009). The species is recorded at densities of 10-200 birds/km2 (Baptista et al. 2020). Given the size of its range, the population is not suspected to be fewer than 10,000 mature individuals.
Trend justification: There is some uncertainty over the trend, driven principally by some differences in urban and rural areas (Carpenter et al. 2021), although it is not suspected to be declining. This species underwent a drastic decline following European settlement and some populations were reported still to be in steep decline in the 1990s: e.g. a survey in Northland in 1993 found a 50% decline over 14 years (Pierce et al. 1993). Recoveries are later recorded in Northland however following intensive predator management (Smith & Westbrooke 2004, Baber et al. 2009) and the current population is still considered conservation dependent (Robertson et al. 2017, 2021). While the contemporary population is much declined compared to that of pre-European settlement, the species has been listed in New Zealand as 'Not Threatened' (according to criteria established by Townsend et al. 2008) and having an increasing population since 2008 (Robertson et al. 2013, 2017, 2021), representing a genuine improvement in status since 2005 when it was listed by Hitchmough et al. (2007) as being in gradual decline. These assessments are supported further by data in Brandt et al. (2020) that show a 43% increase in observations as part of the New Zealand Garden Bird Survey between 2009 and 2019, with a more rapid increase (of 52%) between 2014 and 2019, including increases detected in all regions across Northland and Southland. The overall population is therefore tentatively suspected to be increasing. However, factors underlying temporal occupancy and limiting population sizes are spatially variable and there may be some local fluctuations in response to food abundance and predator control (Carpenter et al. 2021).
Country/Territory | Presence | Origin | Resident | Breeding visitor | Non-breeding visitor | Passage migrant |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
New Zealand | extant | native | yes | |||
Norfolk Island (to Australia) | extinct | native | yes |
Country/Territory | IBA Name |
---|
Habitat (level 1) | Habitat (level 2) | Importance | Occurrence |
---|---|---|---|
Artificial/Terrestrial | Rural Gardens | suitable | breeding |
Artificial/Terrestrial | Rural Gardens | suitable | non-breeding |
Forest | Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland | suitable | breeding |
Forest | Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland | suitable | non-breeding |
Forest | Temperate | major | breeding |
Forest | Temperate | major | non-breeding |
Altitude | 0 - 1100 m | Occasional altitudinal limits |
Threat (level 1) | Threat (level 2) | Impact and Stresses | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Biological resource use | Hunting & trapping terrestrial animals - Intentional use (species is the target) | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | No decline | Low Impact: 4 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Biological resource use | Logging & wood harvesting - Unintentional effects: (subsistence/small scale) [harvest] | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Negligible declines | Low Impact: 4 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Invasive and other problematic species, genes & diseases | Invasive non-native/alien species/diseases - Felis catus | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Majority (50-90%) | Negligible declines | Low Impact: 5 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Invasive and other problematic species, genes & diseases | Invasive non-native/alien species/diseases - Mustela erminea | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Majority (50-90%) | Negligible declines | Low Impact: 5 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Invasive and other problematic species, genes & diseases | Invasive non-native/alien species/diseases - Rattus rattus | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Majority (50-90%) | Negligible declines | Low Impact: 5 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Invasive and other problematic species, genes & diseases | Invasive non-native/alien species/diseases - Trichosurus vulpecula | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Majority (50-90%) | Negligible declines | Low Impact: 5 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Residential & commercial development | Housing & urban areas | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Negligible declines | Low Impact: 4 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Transportation & service corridors | Roads & railroads | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | No decline | Low Impact: 4 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Transportation & service corridors | Utility & service lines | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | No decline | Low Impact: 4 | ||||||
|
Purpose | Scale |
---|---|
Food - human | subsistence, national |
Pets/display animals, horticulture | international |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2025) Species factsheet: New Zealand Pigeon Hemiphaga novaeseelandiae. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/new-zealand-pigeon-hemiphaga-novaeseelandiae on 03/01/2025.
Recommended citation for factsheets for more than one species: BirdLife International (2025) IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/search on 03/01/2025.