VU
New Britain Goshawk Accipiter princeps



Taxonomy

Taxonomic source(s)
del Hoyo, J., Collar, N.J., Christie, D.A., Elliott, A. and Fishpool, L.D.C. 2014. HBW and BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World. Volume 1: Non-passerines. Lynx Edicions BirdLife International, Barcelona, Spain and Cambridge, UK.

IUCN Red List criteria met and history
Red List criteria met
Critically Endangered Endangered Vulnerable
- - C2a(ii)

Red List history
Year Category Criteria
2024 Vulnerable C2a(ii)
2016 Vulnerable C2a(ii)
2012 Vulnerable C2a(ii)
2010 Vulnerable C2a(ii)
2008 Vulnerable C2a(ii)
2004 Near Threatened
2000 Lower Risk/Near Threatened
1994 Lower Risk/Near Threatened
1988 Near Threatened
Species attributes

Migratory status not a migrant Forest dependency high
Land-mass type Average mass -
Range

Estimate Data quality
Extent of Occurrence (breeding/resident) 47,900 km2 medium
Severely fragmented? no -
Population
Estimate Data quality Derivation Year of estimate
Population size 2500-9999 mature individuals poor estimated 2023
Population trend decreasing poor inferred 2017-2032
Rate of change over the past 10 years/3 generations (longer of the two periods) 1-9% - - -
Rate of change over the future 10 years/3 generations (longer of the two periods) 1-9% - - -
Rate of change over the past & future 10 years/3 generations (longer of the two periods) 1-9% - - -
Generation length 5.25 years - - -
Number of subpopulations 1 - - -
Percentage of mature individuals in largest subpopulation 100% - - -

Population justification: Undoubtedly scarce. Both Buchanan et al. (2008) and Davis et al. (2017) 'estimated' the global population size to lie in the band 2,500-10,000 mature individuals, although without clear elucidation, whereas Ferguson-Lees and Christie (2001) thought the population to be only in the high hundreds. A coarse GIS exercise suggests that the area of available habitat is no more than c.8,300 km2. Accurate density estimates for Accipiter hawks are few, however no forest species is known to exceed 1/km2 (see Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001), thus the estimate of 2,500-10,000 mature individuals is accepted here on the basis that it is highly unlikely to exceed it. Future survey effort should aim to elucidate its true density, however, as it may number considerably fewer.

Trend justification: This species is highly dependent on old-growth forest and occurs at significantly lower densities in degraded forests (Buchanan et al. 2008, Davis et al. 2017, G. Dutson in litt. 2024). Forest loss is ongoing, with remote sensing data relatively insensitive to additional impacts of habitat degradation. As such, a continuing decline can be inferred. Buchanan et al. (2008) calculated the rate of forest loss within the species' range on New Britain as 9.5% over three generations, using a longer three-generation time span of 28.5 years (vs 15.75 years; Bird et al. 2020). Using a recalculation of the generation length (5.25 years; Bird et al. 2020), remote sensing data indicate that forest cover extent in this species' range reduced by c.3% overall in the three generations to 2022 (Global Forest Watch 2023, based on data from Hansen et al. [2013] and methods disclosed therein), and increased rates of loss between 2018-2022 suggest forest loss is currently ongoing at a rate equivalent to 5-6% over three generations. Tentatively, declines are placed in the range 1-9% in three generations and are suspected to continue at the same rate in the future.


Country/territory distribution
Country/Territory Presence Origin Resident Breeding visitor Non-breeding visitor Passage migrant
Papua New Guinea extant native yes

Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBA)
Country/Territory IBA Name

Habitats & altitude
Habitat (level 1) Habitat (level 2) Importance Occurrence
Forest Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland major resident
Forest Subtropical/Tropical Moist Montane major resident
Altitude 750 - 1400 m Occasional altitudinal limits 0 - 1600 m

Threats & impact
Threat (level 1) Threat (level 2) Impact and Stresses
Biological resource use Logging & wood harvesting - Unintentional effects: (large scale) [harvest] Timing Scope Severity Impact
Ongoing Minority (<50%) Slow, Significant Declines Low Impact: 5
Stresses
Ecosystem degradation, Ecosystem conversion
Biological resource use Logging & wood harvesting - Unintentional effects: (subsistence/small scale) [harvest] Timing Scope Severity Impact
Ongoing Minority (<50%) Slow, Significant Declines Low Impact: 5
Stresses
Ecosystem degradation, Ecosystem conversion

Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Species factsheet: New Britain Goshawk Accipiter princeps. Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/new-britain-goshawk-accipiter-princeps on 30/12/2024.
Recommended citation for factsheets for more than one species: BirdLife International (2024) IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/search on 30/12/2024.