Current view: Data table and detailed info
Taxonomic note
Todiramphus veneratus and T. youngi (del Hoyo and Collar 2014) were previously lumped as T. veneratus following Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993).
Taxonomic source(s)
del Hoyo, J., Collar, N.J., Christie, D.A., Elliott, A. and Fishpool, L.D.C. 2014. HBW and BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World. Volume 1: Non-passerines. Lynx Edicions BirdLife International, Barcelona, Spain and Cambridge, UK.
IUCN Red List criteria met and history
Red List criteria met
Red List history
Migratory status |
not a migrant |
Forest dependency |
low |
Land-mass type |
|
Average mass |
- |
Population justification: Using variable distance point-transect surveys at 46 stations, Kesler et al. (2010) found that in undeveloped upland forests (i.e. those probably most suitable) this species can occur at density up to 240 birds/km2. Based on their methodology, the majority of these are assumed to be mature individuals; the density is therefore set arbitrarily to 170-210 mature individuals/km2. Although ZoBell and Furnas (2017) found the species to be present in habitat they designated as 'agricultural', their survey sites were all in close proximity to forest and had scattered trees. In other areas of the island, clearance has been more extensive and given this species' dependence on trees with capacity for cavity excavation for nesting, in these areas it is assumed to be absent. A coarse GIS exercise suggests there is c.80 km2 of suitable habitat now on the island yielding an absolute maximum of c.13,600-16,800 mature individuals. However, it must also be acknowledged that density estimates were made in the most suitable habitats for this species and there is a considered here a reasonable chance the species' population size falls below 10,000 mature individuals. The population size is therefore broadly thought to comprise 7,500-15,000 mature individuals in the absence of a more accurate exercise that quantifies land cover on the island.
Trend justification: ZoBall and Furnas (2017) found that localities that were degraded (areas of forest converted to agriculture), had more non-native birds than native species, and the presence of non-native birds was negatively associated with the presence of the Moorea Kingfisher (see also Wray 2013). In more extreme examples of clearance on the island, the species is assumed to be absent, or at least not breeding, since the latter requires trees with capacity for cavity excavation (see Kesler et al. 2010). Global Forest Watch (2022) data are not available for Mo'orea such that estimating a rate of habitat clearance is not possible, however satellite data (Google Earth 2021) show the expansion of some urban areas and clearance of native forest between 2014 and 2019. Given ongoing clearance and degradation is thought to be causing losses in kingfisher territories (V. ZoBell in litt. 2022), the population is inferred to be declining.
Country/territory distribution
Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBA)
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Species factsheet: Moorea Kingfisher Todiramphus youngi. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/moorea-kingfisher-todiramphus-youngi on 24/11/2024.
Recommended citation for factsheets for more than one species: BirdLife International (2024) IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/search on 24/11/2024.