Current view: Data table and detailed info
Taxonomic source(s)
del Hoyo, J., Collar, N.J., Christie, D.A., Elliott, A. and Fishpool, L.D.C. 2014. HBW and BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World. Volume 1: Non-passerines. Lynx Edicions BirdLife International, Barcelona, Spain and Cambridge, UK.
IUCN Red List criteria met and history
Red List criteria met
Red List history
Migratory status |
not a migrant |
Forest dependency |
high |
Land-mass type |
shelf island
|
Average mass |
- |
Population justification: The species is said to be very local by Allen (2020), but König and Weick (2008) note that locally calling individuals (presumably males) may be spaced by no more than 150 m. The latter is somewhat supported by eBird (2023) data, which suggests that on Mt. Halcon (which comprises a significant part of the species' range) transects of 1 km typically detected multiple individuals. If the description by König and Weick (2008) is representative, a density of up to 90 mature individuals/km2 is possible, although is likely to represent the maximum possible density. In total, c.700 km2 of forested habitat remains in its range, and suspecting a density of 45-90 mature individuals/km2, and an occupancy of 50-70%, the population size is estimated at 15,750-44,000 mature individuals. It is recognised, however, that these figures are based on poor data, and a refinement of this estimate is urgently sought.
Trend justification: The only identified threat for this species is forest loss. Although rates are currently thought to be slow, this species is considered to be dependent on closed-canopy forest (König and Weick 2008, Allen 2020). Remote sensing data indicate that c.3% of forest cover was lost in this species' range between 2012 and 2022 (Global Forest Watch 2023, based on data from Hansen et al. [2013] and methods disclosed therein), which is thought to have had an equivalent impact on the population, placed here at an ongoing rate of 1–9% over ten years. Rates, and the impact, of degradation are unknown, but may be causing additive declines.
Country/territory distribution
Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBA)
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Species factsheet: Mindoro Scops-owl Otus mindorensis. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/mindoro-scops-owl-otus-mindorensis on 23/12/2024.
Recommended citation for factsheets for more than one species: BirdLife International (2024) IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/search on 23/12/2024.