Current view: Data table and detailed info
Taxonomic note
Ninox philippensis, N. spilocephala, N. leventisi, N. reyi, N. rumseyi, N. spilonotus and N. mindorensis (del Hoyo and Collar 2014) were previously lumped as N. philippensis following Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993).
Taxonomic source(s)
del Hoyo, J., Collar, N.J., Christie, D.A., Elliott, A. and Fishpool, L.D.C. 2014. HBW and BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World. Volume 1: Non-passerines. Lynx Edicions BirdLife International, Barcelona, Spain and Cambridge, UK.
IUCN Red List criteria met and history
Red List criteria met
Red List history
Migratory status |
not a migrant |
Forest dependency |
medium |
Land-mass type |
|
Average mass |
- |
Population justification: Within its range remains a maximum of c.2,000 km2 of suitable habitat (calculated by sRedList [2023], using underlying data from Jung et al. [2020]), however some of this is heavily degraded and it appears to be commoner at lower elevations (with most remaining habitat >1,000 m).
Using satellite tracking data, Jakosalem et al. (2013) estimated densities as high as 10 pairs/km2 for the formerly conspecific and similar-sized N. rumseyi of Cebu. However, this density was based on home ranges from satellite-tracking data that the authors acknowledged were likely to be too small due to the short time the birds were followed for. The estimated home ranges were, for example, up to ten times smaller than that of another similar-sized Ninox species (Olsen et al. 2011).
Assuming 30-60% occupancy, and a range of densities of 4-20 mature individuals/km2 gives a range of c.2,400-24,000 mature individuals. This is rounded here to 2,500-25,000 mature individuals, with a best estimate at the lower range of this (2,500-9,999).
Trend justification: The main plausible threat to this species is habitat loss and degradation. While historically rates of lowland forest cover loss were very high on Mindoro (BirdLife International 2001), recent rates have been much slower, and over the past three generations (16 years: 2007-2023) forest cover in this species' range was reduced by 5-7% (Global Forest Watch 2024, based on data from Hansen et al. [2013] and methods therein). Moreover, degradation may have additive impacts, and only small areas of Mindoro's lowland forests have high intactness (Grantham et al. 2020). Overall, the population is suspected to have declined by 5-15% over the past three generations. Future rates of decline are highly uncertain, and not estimated here.
Country/territory distribution
Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBA)
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Species factsheet: Mindoro Boobook Ninox mindorensis. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/mindoro-boobook-ninox-mindorensis on 24/11/2024.
Recommended citation for factsheets for more than one species: BirdLife International (2024) IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/search on 24/11/2024.