Taxonomic note
Two subspecies recognized.
Taxonomic source(s)
del Hoyo, J., Collar, N.J., Christie, D.A., Elliott, A. and Fishpool, L.D.C. 2014. HBW and BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World. Volume 1: Non-passerines. Lynx Edicions BirdLife International, Barcelona, Spain and Cambridge, UK.
SACC. 2005 and updates. A classification of the bird species of South America. Available at: https://www.museum.lsu.edu/~Remsen/SACCBaseline.htm.
Critically Endangered | Endangered | Vulnerable |
---|---|---|
- | - | A2bc+4bc |
Year | Category | Criteria |
---|---|---|
2024 | Vulnerable | A2bc+4bc |
2016 | Least Concern | |
2012 | Least Concern | |
2009 | Least Concern | |
2008 | Least Concern | |
2004 | Least Concern | |
2000 | Lower Risk/Least Concern | |
1994 | Lower Risk/Least Concern | |
1988 | Lower Risk/Least Concern |
Migratory status | full migrant | Forest dependency | does not normally occur in forest |
Land-mass type | Average mass | - |
Estimate | Data quality | |
---|---|---|
Extent of Occurrence (breeding/resident) | 4,200,000 km2 | medium |
Extent of Occurrence (non-breeding) | 15,100,000 km2 | medium |
Severely fragmented? | no | - |
Estimate | Data quality | Derivation | Year of estimate | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Population size | 270000 mature individuals | medium | estimated | 2023 |
Population trend | decreasing | - | estimated | 2010-2037 |
Rate of change over the past 10 years/3 generations (longer of the two periods) | 20-49% | - | - | - |
Rate of change over the past & future 10 years/3 generations (longer of the two periods) | 20-49% | - | - | - |
Generation length | 9.05 years | - | - | - |
Number of subpopulations | 2 | - | - | - |
Percentage of mature individuals in largest subpopulation | 1-89% | - | - | - |
Population justification: The global population is estimated to number 270,000 mature individuals (Partners in Flight 2023), and is assumed to be structured into two subpopulations that accord with the two species recognised in the species.
A combination of monitoring data from breeding, migration and especially non-breeding sites indicates that there is currently a rapid population reduction underway (Ziolkowski et al. 2022, Muñoz-Salas et al. 2023, Smith et al. 2023).
Trend justification:
Data from the North American Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) indicate declines of c.17% in the three-generation period 1994-2021, with no indication the rate is slowing (Ziolkowski Jr. et al. 2022). Incorporating a combination of U.S. Geological Survey and Canadian Wildlife Service analyses of BBS survey data through 2021, an overall reduction of 31.0% (-43.8 to -16.4%) within three generations was estimated in the Avian Conservation Assessment Database December 2023 update (Partners in Flight 2023). There appear to have been an acceleration in the rates of reduction in the past few years, with the Prairie Potholes Bird Conservation region (the core part of the breeding range) showing a sustained and worsening trend, although an increase is noted for the smaller population in the Badlands/Prairies Bird Conservation Region (Ziolkowski Jr. et al. 2022, N. Warnock in litt. 2024).
Surveys of migratory stopover locations throughout North America (Smith et al. 2023) support the fact that a moderately rapid to rapid reduction is taking place, with an estimated reduction of 28.9% in three generations. However this trend has poor precision and the majority of the population is not sampled by the network of sites involved: the trend has wide confidence intervals of -75.9% to +55.0% (Smith et al. 2023).
The most concerning data come from monitoring of non-breeding areas. Wintering populations of Marbled Godwits in north-west Mexico and California are thought to have declined by 7.7% annually based on Migratory Shorebird Project data during 2011–2019 (Muñoz-Salas et al. 2023). This is equivalent to a three-generation reduction of c.89%, and it is suspected that about half of the non-breeding population is expected to occur in this area. Elsewhere however, trends appear to be stable. Christmas Bird Count data (Meehan et al. 2022) show a relatively stable/slightly increasing trend overall for the three-generation period to 2021. Also, there are well-studied sites on the west coast that have remained stable, for example Tomales Bay (Warnock et al. 2021): it is possible this represents a high-quality site that attracts individuals up to the carrying capacity of the site, hence counts would remain constant while other sites see declining numbers. An alternative possible explanation for the conflicting trends may be ‘short-stopping’, where fewer individuals complete the expected full distance of their migration and instead stay in sites closer to breeding areas, although declines noted further south are not offset by stability at some sites further north.
Overall, based on data sources that cover most of the species’ range, the population decline is estimated to fall within the band 20-49% for the past and current three generations, up to 2037 (based on trend data accelerating after 2010). Uncertainty over the future rate of decline means that a value for the future three generations is not determined.
Country/Territory | Presence | Origin | Resident | Breeding visitor | Non-breeding visitor | Passage migrant |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bahamas | extant | native | yes | |||
Belize | extant | native | yes | |||
Canada | extant | native | yes | yes | yes | |
Cayman Islands (to UK) | extant | native | yes | |||
Colombia | extant | native | yes | |||
Costa Rica | extant | native | yes | yes | ||
Cuba | extant | native | yes | |||
El Salvador | extant | native | yes | yes | ||
Grenada | extant | vagrant | ||||
Guadeloupe (to France) | extant | vagrant | ||||
Guatemala | extant | native | yes | yes | ||
Honduras | extant | native | yes | yes | ||
Jamaica | extant | native | yes | |||
Mexico | extant | native | yes | yes | ||
Nicaragua | extant | native | yes | |||
Panama | extant | native | yes | yes | ||
St Pierre and Miquelon (to France) | extant | vagrant | ||||
USA | extant | native | yes | yes | yes | |
Virgin Islands (to UK) | extant | vagrant | ||||
Virgin Islands (to USA) | extant | vagrant |
Country/Territory | IBA Name |
---|---|
Costa Rica | Nicoya Gulf mangroves and coastal areas |
Mexico | Agiabampo |
Mexico | Área de San Quintín |
Mexico | Bahía Magdalena-Almejas |
Mexico | Bahía Navachiste |
Mexico | Bahía Santa María |
Mexico | Bahía Todos Santos |
Mexico | Complejo Lagunar Ojo de Liebre |
Mexico | Complejo Lagunar San Ignacio |
Mexico | Delta del Río Colorado |
Mexico | Ensenada de la Paz |
Mexico | Ensenada de Pabellones |
Mexico | Estero Lobos |
Mexico | Marismas Nacionales |
Mexico | Sistema Tóbari |
Mexico | Zonas Húmedas de Yávaros |
USA | Bear River Bay UT02 |
USA | Salton Sea |
Habitat (level 1) | Habitat (level 2) | Importance | Occurrence |
---|---|---|---|
Grassland | Temperate | major | breeding |
Marine Intertidal | Mud Flats and Salt Flats | major | non-breeding |
Marine Intertidal | Salt Marshes (Emergent Grasses) | suitable | non-breeding |
Marine Intertidal | Sandy Shoreline and/or Beaches, Sand Bars, Spits, Etc | suitable | non-breeding |
Marine Neritic | Estuaries | major | non-breeding |
Wetlands (inland) | Bogs, Marshes, Swamps, Fens, Peatlands | major | breeding |
Altitude | 0 - 150 m | Occasional altitudinal limits |
Threat (level 1) | Threat (level 2) | Impact and Stresses | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Agriculture & aquaculture | Annual & perennial non-timber crops - Agro-industry farming | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Unknown | Unknown | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Biological resource use | Hunting & trapping terrestrial animals - Intentional use (species is the target) | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Past, Unlikely to Return | Majority (50-90%) | Rapid Declines | Past Impact | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Human intrusions & disturbance | Recreational activities | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Unknown | Unknown | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Natural system modifications | Dams & water management/use - Abstraction of surface water (agricultural use) | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Unknown | Unknown | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Residential & commercial development | Commercial & industrial areas | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Negligible declines | Low Impact: 4 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Residential & commercial development | Housing & urban areas | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Negligible declines | Low Impact: 4 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Transportation & service corridors | Roads & railroads | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Negligible declines | Low Impact: 4 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Transportation & service corridors | Utility & service lines | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Slow, Significant Declines | Low Impact: 5 | ||||||
|
Purpose | Scale |
---|---|
Food - human | subsistence, national |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Species factsheet: Marbled Godwit Limosa fedoa. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/marbled-godwit-limosa-fedoa on 22/11/2024.
Recommended citation for factsheets for more than one species: BirdLife International (2024) IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/search on 22/11/2024.