Current view: Data table and detailed info
Taxonomic source(s)
del Hoyo, J., Collar, N.J., Christie, D.A., Elliott, A. and Fishpool, L.D.C. 2014. HBW and BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World. Volume 1: Non-passerines. Lynx Edicions BirdLife International, Barcelona, Spain and Cambridge, UK.
IUCN Red List criteria met and history
Red List criteria met
Red List history
Migratory status |
not a migrant |
Forest dependency |
high |
Land-mass type |
|
Average mass |
- |
Population justification: There are no empirical data available from which to estimate this species' population size and even qualitative estimations of its abundance are obfuscated by its remote distribution and by virtue of it being an infrequently observed, nocturnal species for which, until relatively recently, the vocalisations were not known (Yong et al. 2012). Even so, it is described as 'uncommon' in Eaton et al. (2021) and is evidently not an abundant species, although may be regularly observed at known, accessible sites (eBird 2023). Although a population size is not estimated herein, there is more than 100,000 km2 of forest in its mapped range, such that even if a small percentage of this is occupied, the population size is unlikely to be small. With no known acting threats on the species, there is no evidence that the contemporary population size is significantly depleted from a historic baseline.
Trend justification: The only threat known to be acting on this species is habitat loss and degradation. In the past three generations (15 years: 2007-2022), forest cover has reduced by only 2-3% in this species' range, and some of these losses are attributable to natural phenomena including landslides (Global Forest Watch 2023, based on data from Hansen et al. [2013] and methods disclosed therein). This species appears dependent on primary forest, even if it strays over clearings and tracks when foraging (Yong et al. 2012, Eaton et al. 2021), and these minor losses are suspected of causing a very slow, ongoing decline. Nonetheless, these declines are unlikely to be occurring at a rate that exceeds 5% over three generations. The range of E. diabolicus is mostly contained to forest that is considered the least susceptible to exploitation in the future (see Voigt et al. 2021), and declines are therefore unlikely to accelerate in the future.
Country/territory distribution
Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBA)
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Species factsheet: Heinrich's Nightjar Eurostopodus diabolicus. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/heinrichs-nightjar-eurostopodus-diabolicus on 22/11/2024.
Recommended citation for factsheets for more than one species: BirdLife International (2024) IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/search on 22/11/2024.