LC
Graceful Honeyeater Microptilotis gracilis



Taxonomy

Taxonomic note
Microptilotis gracilis has been split as Graceful Honeyeater M. gracilis and Imitatress Honeyeater M. imitatrix after a scrupulous comparison by Nielsen (2018), which found that M. imitatrix differs by its; less circular, more wedge-shaped ‘ear-spot’ (1); navy blue vs dark brown iris (2); greyish-olive vs off-white belly and undertail-coverts (2); usually paler yellow gape (ns); hugely restricted vocal repertoire (‘only two simple vocalisations and possibly no song’) vs a ‘remarkable repertoire of complex vocalisations, all of which can be heard throughout its range’ (at least 3).
Previously M. gracilis and M. cinereifrons (del Hoyo and Collar 2016) were lumped as Meliphaga gracilis following Christidis and Boles (2008); Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993).

Taxonomic source(s)
Handbook of the Birds of the World and BirdLife International. 2019. Handbook of the Birds of the World and BirdLife International digital checklist of the birds of the world. Version 4. Available at: https://datazone.birdlife.org/userfiles/file/Species/Taxonomy/HBW-BirdLife_Checklist_v4_Dec19.zip.
Nielsen, L. 2018. Are there two species of Graceful Honeyeater in Australia? Australian Field Ornithology 35: 149-157.

IUCN Red List criteria met and history
Red List criteria met
Critically Endangered Endangered Vulnerable
- - -

Red List history
Year Category Criteria
2019 Least Concern
2016 Not Recognised
2012 Not Recognised
2008 Not Recognised
2004 Not Recognised
2000 Not Recognised
1994 Not Recognised
1988 Not Recognised
Species attributes

Migratory status not a migrant Forest dependency medium
Land-mass type Average mass -
Range

Estimate Data quality
Extent of Occurrence (breeding/resident) 792,000 km2
Severely fragmented? no -
Population
Estimate Data quality Derivation Year of estimate
Population size unknown - - -
Population trend stable - suspected -
Generation length 5.5 years - - -

Population justification: The global population size has not been quantified, but the species is described as generally common (Higgins et al. 2019).

Trend justification: The population is suspected to be stable in the absence of evidence for any declines or substantial threats (Higgins et al. 2019).


Country/territory distribution
Country/Territory Presence Origin Resident Breeding visitor Non-breeding visitor Passage migrant
Australia extant native yes
Indonesia extant native yes
Papua New Guinea extant native yes

Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBA)
Country/Territory IBA Name

Habitats & altitude
Habitat (level 1) Habitat (level 2) Importance Occurrence
Artificial/Terrestrial Rural Gardens suitable resident
Artificial/Terrestrial Subtropical/Tropical Heavily Degraded Former Forest suitable resident
Artificial/Terrestrial Urban Areas suitable resident
Forest Subtropical/Tropical Mangrove Vegetation Above High Tide Level suitable resident
Forest Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland major resident
Savanna Moist suitable resident
Altitude 0 - 500 m Occasional altitudinal limits 0 - 800 m

Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Species factsheet: Graceful Honeyeater Microptilotis gracilis. Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/graceful-honeyeater-microptilotis-gracilis on 26/12/2024.
Recommended citation for factsheets for more than one species: BirdLife International (2024) IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/search on 26/12/2024.