LC
Dayak Blue Flycatcher Cyornis montanus



Taxonomy

Taxonomic note
Previously listed as a subspecies of C. banyumas (del Hoyo and Collar 2016). Differs from C. whitei in: uniformly orange underparts in both sexes vs whitish belly and vent (3); lack of rufous tinge in tail (1); very short tail (allow 3, but probably 4), and evidently different voice (Gwee et al. 2019) (not assessed, but at least 1). The statement, however, in Eaton et al. (2016) about montanus having a ‘bright blue rump’ (also mentioned in HBW) is, on evidence in NHMUK, mistaken, and the amount on the blue-black on the chin is tiny. Differs from C. banyumas in strength and number of characters sufficient to be treated as specifically distinct, namely: darker upperparts in male (1); browner vs greyer upperparts in female (2); stronger orange breast in female (ns[1]); lack of rufous tinge in tail (1); narrower black chin in male (ns[1]); much shorter tail (allow 3, but probably 4); evidently different voice (Gwee et al. 2019) (not assessed, but at least 1). Previously and erroneously listed as C. (banyumas) coeruleatus in HBW and elsewhere (Peters 1931–1987), but the name coeruleatus is unavailable (Dickinson and Christidis 2014). Monotypic.

Taxonomic source(s)
Handbook of the Birds of the World and BirdLife International. 2022. Handbook of the Birds of the World and BirdLife International digital checklist of the birds of the world. Version 7. Available at: https://datazone.birdlife.org/userfiles/file/Species/Taxonomy/HBW-BirdLife_Checklist_v7_Dec22.zip.

IUCN Red List criteria met and history
Red List criteria met
Critically Endangered Endangered Vulnerable
- - -

Red List history
Year Category Criteria
2022 Least Concern
2016 Not Recognised
2012 Not Recognised
2008 Not Recognised
2004 Not Recognised
2000 Not Recognised
1994 Not Recognised
1988 Not Recognised
Species attributes

Migratory status not a migrant Forest dependency does not normally occur in forest
Land-mass type Average mass -
Range

Estimate Data quality
Extent of Occurrence (breeding/resident) 387,000 km2
Severely fragmented? no -
Population
Estimate Data quality Derivation Year of estimate
Population size unknown - - -
Population trend decreasing - suspected 2016-2026
Rate of change over the past 10 years/3 generations (longer of the two periods) 3-4% - - -
Rate of change over the future 10 years/3 generations (longer of the two periods) 3-4% - - -
Rate of change over the past & future 10 years/3 generations (longer of the two periods) 3-4% - - -
Generation length 2.62 years - - -
Number of subpopulations 1 - - -
Percentage of mature individuals in largest subpopulation 100% - - -

Population justification: The population size of this species has not been estimated. It has a large range throughout the central highlands of Borneo, although it is typically described as local or rare (Mann 2008, Eaton et al. 2016).

Trend justification: There are no accurate trend data available for this species, although it is suspected of declining. Forest loss in this species' mapped range has been equivalent to c.3-4% over the past ten years (Global Forest Watch 2022, using data from Hansen et al. [2013] and methods disclosed therein). This species is thought to be moderately forest dependent and is likely to be declining at a rate broadly similar to that of forest loss.


Country/territory distribution
Country/Territory Presence Origin Resident Breeding visitor Non-breeding visitor Passage migrant
Brunei extant native yes
Indonesia extant native yes
Malaysia extant native yes

Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBA)
Country/Territory IBA Name

Habitats & altitude
Habitat (level 1) Habitat (level 2) Importance Occurrence
Forest Subtropical/Tropical Moist Montane major resident
Altitude 400 - 1400 m Occasional altitudinal limits  

Threats & impact
Threat (level 1) Threat (level 2) Impact and Stresses
Agriculture & aquaculture Annual & perennial non-timber crops - Shifting agriculture Timing Scope Severity Impact
Ongoing Minority (<50%) Negligible declines Low Impact: 4
Stresses
Ecosystem degradation, Ecosystem conversion
Agriculture & aquaculture Wood & pulp plantations - Small-holder plantations Timing Scope Severity Impact
Ongoing Minority (<50%) Negligible declines Low Impact: 4
Stresses
Ecosystem degradation, Ecosystem conversion

Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2025) Species factsheet: Dayak Blue Flycatcher Cyornis montanus. Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/dayak-blue-flycatcher-cyornis-montanus on 05/01/2025.
Recommended citation for factsheets for more than one species: BirdLife International (2025) IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/search on 05/01/2025.