Current view: Data table and detailed info
Taxonomic note
Ramphastos citreolaemus (HBW and BirdLife International 2017) was previously listed as R. citrolaemus (del Hoyo and Collar 2014) . R. vitellinus, R. culminatus, R. citrolaemus and R. ariel (del Hoyo and Collar 2014) were previously lumped as R. vitellinus following SACC (2006) and a review by the BirdLife Taxonomic Working Group, and before then were split as R. vitellinus, R. culminatus and R. citreolaemus following Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993).
One of the so-called “croaking group” of toucans (see R. toco), along with three species usually considered conspecific with it because of extensive hybrid populations which render it difficult to draw strict boundaries separating forms geographically. Nevertheless, present species differs from R. culminatus (with which it groups morphologically against R. vitellinus and R. ariel; which see) in its lemon-yellow (vs white) breast (3); greenish-yellow (vs yellow) culmen (ns1); differently coloured bill base, replacing yellow (upper) and blue (lower) with blue on both mandibles shading to yellow and red adjacent to feathers of face (2); paler yellow rump (ns1); and iris dark blue (vs brown) (Short & Horne 2001) (1, possibly 2); also, broad hybrid zone (1). Previously listed as R. citrolaemus (del Hoyo and Collar 2014). Monotypic.
Taxonomic source(s)
Handbook of the Birds of the World and BirdLife International. 2022. Handbook of the Birds of the World and BirdLife International digital checklist of the birds of the world. Version 7. Available at: https://datazone.birdlife.org/userfiles/file/Species/Taxonomy/HBW-BirdLife_Checklist_v7_Dec22.zip.
HBW and BirdLife International. 2017. Taxonomic checklist of the birds of the world. V2.0.
IUCN Red List criteria met and history
Red List criteria met
Red List history
Migratory status |
not a migrant |
Forest dependency |
high |
Land-mass type |
|
Average mass |
- |
Population justification: The global population size has not been quantified, but the species is described as uncommon in Colombia and as scarce and local in Venezuela (del Hoyo et al. 2020, see also eBird 2023).
Trend justification: The population trend has not been quantified, but declines are suspected owing to habitat fragmentation and loss of suitable nesting sites (del Hoyo et al. 2002, 2020).
Even though data on its habitat requirements are scarce, this species appears to show a stronger preference for mature forest habitat (per del Hoyo et al. 2020). Over the past three generations (17.9 years), 12% of tree cover has been lost within the range; from 2017 onward this has been accelerating to a rate equivalent to 16% over three generations (Global Forest Watch 2023, using Hansen et al. [2013] data and methods disclosed therein). These values however do not account for the additional impacts of forest degradation and fragmentation. Precautionarily it is therefore suspected that overall habitat loss (i.e. the combined effect of tree cover loss, forest fragmentation and degradation) exceeds the rate of tree cover loss by half, suggesting an overall rate of habitat loss of 18% over the past three generations and accelerating to 24% over three generations from 2017 onward. Assuming that population declines in this forest-dependent species are roughly equivalent to the rate of habitat loss, population declines are here placed in the band 10-19% over the past three generations, with the rate accelerating to 20-29% from 2017 onward.
Country/territory distribution
Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBA)
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Species factsheet: Citron-throated Toucan Ramphastos citreolaemus. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/citron-throated-toucan-ramphastos-citreolaemus on 27/12/2024.
Recommended citation for factsheets for more than one species: BirdLife International (2024) IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/search on 27/12/2024.