Current view: Data table and detailed info
Taxonomic note
Cryptopipo holochlora and C. litae (del Hoyo and Collar 2016) were previously lumped as Xenopipo holochlora following AOU (1998 and supplements), SACC (2005 and updates), Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993) and Stotz et al. (1996).
Taxonomic source(s)
del Hoyo, J., Collar, N.J., Christie, D.A., Elliott, A., Fishpool, L.D.C., Boesman, P. and Kirwan, G.M. 2016. HBW and BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World. Volume 2: Passerines. Lynx Edicions and BirdLife International, Barcelona, Spain and Cambridge, UK.
IUCN Red List criteria met and history
Red List criteria met
Red List history
Migratory status |
not a migrant |
Forest dependency |
high |
Land-mass type |
|
Average mass |
- |
Population justification: The global population size has not been quantified given recent taxonomic splits. The pre-split species has been described as 'fairly common but patchily distributed' (Stotz et al. 1996).
Trend justification:
The population trend has not been investigated. Tree cover loss within the range is very low (2% over ten years; Global Forest Watch 2021, using Hansen et al. [2013] data and methods disclosed therein). Population declines are therefore likely equally low and localised; they are here tentatively placed in the band 1-9% over ten years.
Country/territory distribution
Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBA)
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Species factsheet: Choco Manakin Cryptopipo litae. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/choco-manakin-cryptopipo-litae on 22/12/2024.
Recommended citation for factsheets for more than one species: BirdLife International (2024) IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/search on 22/12/2024.